Get Permission Kalagara and Akude: A symptomatic bacteriuria in antenatal women attending tertiary care hospital at Hyderabad


Introduction

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections during pregnancy. It can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. Increased risk of UTI in pregnant women is due to anatomical changes and physiological adaptations during pregnancy.1 Untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in pregnancy predisposes to symptomatic UTI in 25% of infected women.2 Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of ASB curbs the risk of pyelonephritis, ecclampsia, preterm delivery and adverse fetal outcomes. This prospective study was conducted to determine the occurrence of ASB, its etiological agents and their antibacterial susceptibility pattern in selected group of pregnant women.

Materials and Methods

The present study was carried out on in department of Microbiology at ESIC medical college, Telangana from September 2016 to March 2017. Study population included total of 346 antenatal women of gestational ages 28 weeks or less with no symptoms of urinary tract infection (UTI) attending for antenatal checkup. Patients with fever, incontinence or renal stones, diabetes, hypertension, recent history of antibiotic intake were excluded from study. Data regarding age, gravida, trimester, associated risk factors were obtained from standard proforma in requisition form filled by clinician. Clean catch midstream urine sample were cultured and identified by standard microbiological methods. Semi-quantitative culture of urine samples was done on blood and MacConkey agar by standard loop technique.3 Growth was interpreted as significant in Gram negative bacteria if colony count was >= to 105 colony forming unit per milliliter (CFU/ml) of urine. In Gram positive bacteria colony count of 102 CFU/ml of urine was considered significant. All bacterial isolates showing significant growth were identified by standard biochemical methods. 4 The antibiotic sensitivity testing (AST) of the isolates was be done by Kirby Bauer method according to CLSI guidelines.5

Result

Among total of 346 antenatal women screened 85.5% samples were sterile. Significant bacterial growth was found in 38 (11%) cases, 12(3.5%) cases showed insignificant growth of mixed bacterial flora. The age, gravida and trimester of participants did not have any statistical significance on ASB in present study. Escherichia coli (42.1%) and Enterococcus faecalis (42.1%) were most common isolates followed by Staphylococcus aureus (7.9%), Klebsiella pneumonia (5.3%) and Enterobacter aerogenes (2.6%) (Table 1). Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of most common gram negative bacteria, Escherichia coli revealed good sensitivity to cefotaxime (93.75%), amikacin (87.5%), nitrofurantoin (87.5%) and cotrimoxazole (81%). Sensitivity to ampicillin (25%), cefazolin (37.5%), amoxyclav (56%), norfloxacin (68.75%) and ciprofloxacin (75%) was reduced (Table 2). Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of most common gram positive bacteria, Enterococcus faecalis showed good sensitivity of 75% to nitrofurantoin and 67.5% to ampicillin, ciprofloxacin and high level gentamicin. Staphylococcus aureus showed 100% sensitivity to betalactam antibiotics and aminoglycoside (Table 3).

Table 1

Bacterial agents isolated

S.No. Bacterial N (%)
1 Escherichia coli 16 (42.1%)
2 Enterococcus faecalis 16 (42.1%)
3 Staphylococcus aureus 3 (7.8%)
4 Klebsiella pneumoniae 2 (5.3%)
5 Enterobacter aerogenes 1 (2.7%)
Total 38(100%)
Table 2

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Gram negative bacteria

Antibiotics Bacterial isolates
E.coli(16) Klebsiella (2) Enterobacter (1)
S NS S NS S NS
AMP 4 (25%) 12 (75%) NA NA NA NA
AMC 9 (56%) 7 (44%) 0 2 (100%) 0 1 (100%)
COT 13 (81%) 3 (1.9%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 0 1 (100%)
NIT 14 (87.5%) 2 (12.5%) 0 2 (100%) 0 1 (100%)
NX 11 (68.75%) 5 (31.25%) 2 (100%) 0 1(100%) 0
CZ 6 (37.5%) 10 (62.5%) 0 2 (100%) 0 1(100%)
CXM 11 (68.75%) 5 (31.25%) 0 2 (100%) 0 1(100%)
CTX 15 (93.75%) 1 (6.25%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 0 1(100%)
AK 14 (87.5%) 2 (12.5%) 2 (100%) 0 1(100%) 0
CIP 12 (75%) 4 (25%) 1 (50%) 1 (50%) 1(100%) 0
PIP/TAZ 16 (100%) 0 2 (100%) 0 1(100%) 0

[i] S: Sensitive, NS: Nonsensitive, NA: Not applicable

Table 3

Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Gram positive bacteria:

Antibiotics Bacterial isolates
Enterococcus faecalis(16) Staphylococcus aureus (3)
S NS S NS
AMP / AMC 10(62.5%) 6 (37.5%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
NIT 12 (75%) 4 (25%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
NX 9 (56%) 7 (44%) 1 (33%) 2 (67%)
CIP 10 (62.5%) 6 (37.5%) 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
HLG/AK 10 (62.5%) 6 (37.5%) 3 (100%) 0
LZ 16 (100%) 0 3 (100%) 0
COT NA NA 2 (67%) 1 (33%)
CX NA NA 3 (100%) 0
VA 16 (100%) 0 3 (100%) 0

[i] S: Sensitive, NS: Nonsensitive, NA: Not applicable

Table 4

Incidence of ASB in various studies

Study Study population (N) Incidence of ASB (%)
Present study 346 10.9%
Verma A et al10 220 12.27%
R Sujatha et al7 300 7.3%
Chandel et al6 463 7.34%
Shalima et al12 637 49.5%
Ali et al11 358 15.6%
Bose AM et al9 555 4.6%
Imade et al8 1228 45.3%

Discussion

Urinary tract infections are most common infections in females especially in pregnancy. ASB in pregnancy is known to cause grave obstetric complications. Hence it is very important to screen all pregnant women for bacteriuria in every trimester and administer appropriate treatment in order to prevent perinatal and maternal complications. Incidence of ASB in our study was 10.9%. Different Indian and international studies showed incidence range of ASB as 2 to 50%.12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 13, 7, 6 (Table 4) Difference in incidence in studies across the world and in same country is due to differences in geographical location, social behavior, level of education, study population and sample size of participants. The age, gravida and trimester of participants did not have any statistical significance on ASB in present study. The reason for age distribution not having significant association with ASB in present study may be due to the factor that majority of antenatal women enrolled in this study belonged to 20-30 years than those between 31-45 years age group. The parity and gestational age not having significant association with ASB in present study correlated with previous researchers.15, 14, 12 In present study both Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria were predominantly responsible for ASB during pregnancy. The most common Gram negative uropathogen was Escherichia coli (42.1%). Different studies done by Verma et al, 6 Sujatha et al, 7 Chandel et al, 8 Shalima et al,9 Ali et al 10 and Bose et al 11 showed Escherichia coli as most common uropathogen. The most common Gram positive uropathogens was Enterococcus feacalis (42.1%). This finding was in agreement with other studies. 16, 15, 9, 6 Escherichia coli and Enterococcus fecalis are fecal flora that colonize the periurethral area. Profound anatomical and physiological changes during pregnancy result in urinary stasis and dysfunctional vesico-ureteral reflux that aid in UTI by fecal flora. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of gram negative uropathogens showed good susceptibility to nitrofurantoin, cotrimoxazole, cefotaxime and aminoglycosides. Frequently prescribed antibiotics like amoxyclav, cefuroxime and norfloxacin showed increased resistance due to selective antibiotic pressure. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Enterococcus feacalis showed good susceptibility to nitrofurantoin, moderate sensitivity to routinely prescribed antibiotic like amoxyclav, amikacin, ciprofloxacin and poor susceptibility to norfloxacin. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Staphylococcus aureus showed good susceptibility to beta-lactam antibiotics. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern varies from one region to other based on local factors like overt or inappropriate use of selected antibiotics, patient compliance, over the counter availability and prescription of antibiotics without laboratory guidance.

Conclusion

Every pregnant woman in each trimester should have a urine culture done and detected cases should be treated according to the antibiotic susceptibility test. In present study both gram negative and gram positive bacteria were predominantly responsible for ASB. Culture plays a pivotal role as choice of antibiotic varies with the uropathogen isolated. Increasing resistance to commonly used antibiotics shows selective pressure due to their increased prescription. Antibiotic susceptibility testing will aid policy makers to determine the antibiotics to be used for ASB thereby reducing the perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality.

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Dr. Srinivas (Dean), Dr. Rupali (Consultant Microbiologist) and all the technical staff of ESIC hospital for the co-operation extended.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

L Michelim G R Bosi E Comparsi Urinary Tract Infection in Pregnancy: Review of Clinical ManagementJ Clin Nephrol Res20163110307

2 

F G Cunningham N F Gant K J Laveno Renal and urinary tract disorders Williams obstetrics. 21st Ed edMcGraw-Hill Medical Publishing DivisionNew York200112534

3 

Barrow G I Feltham R K A Cowan and steels manual for the identification of medical bacteriaCambridge University pressCambridge1993

4 

J G Collee A G Fraser B P Marmion S A Mackey McCartney Collee JG Miles RS Watt B Practical Medical MicrobiologyTests for the identification of Bacteria. 14th edElsevierNew Delhi200613149

5 

Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility testing. 29th ed. CLSI supplement M100Wayne, PA2019

6 

Lata R. Chandel Anil Kanga Kamlesh Thakur Kiran K. Mokta Anuradha Sood Smriti Chauhan Prevalance of Pregnancy Associated Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: A Study Done in a Tertiary Care HospitalThe Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India20126255115140971-9202, 0975-643410.1007/s13224-011-0071-2Springer Science and Business Media LLChttps://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-011-0071-2

7 

R Sujatha Manju Nawani Asymptomatic Bacteriuria among Pregnant Women Attending the Antenatal Clinic in a Teritiary Care Centre at KanpurJ Clin Diagn Res201484103

8 

Leonard Ajah Fidelis Onu Paul Ezeonu Odidika Umeora Perpetus Ibekwe Monique Ajah Profile and microbiological isolates of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in Abakaliki, NigeriaInfect Drug Resist201582315

9 

A M Bose P K Sreekumary S K Pulikkottil Microbiological profile of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancyCrit Care Obstet Gynecol2016226

10 

Anjana Verma Anamika Vyas Lalit Shrimali Medhavi Sharma Asymptomatic bacteriuria and antibacterial susceptibility during pregnancyInt J Reprod, Contracept, Obstet Gynecol2016540710

11 

I E Ali T Gebrecherkos M Gizachew M Alemayehu Menberu Asymptomatic bacteriuria and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the isolates among pregnant women attending dessie referral hospital, northeast ethiopia: A hospital-based cross-sectional studyTurk J Urol201844325160

12 

S Shalima R Kalaivani G Seethesh K S Seetha Prevalence, bacteriological profile and antimicrobial resistance pattern of aerobic bacterial isolates from antenatal mothers with asymptomatic bacteriuriaIndian J Microbiol Res20174441923

13 

E H Kass Bacteriuria in pregnancy and pyelonephritis of pregnancyArch Intern Med1960105194202

14 

E Tadesse M Teshome Y Merid B Kibret T Shimelis Asymptomatic urinary tract infection among pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic of Hawassa Referral Hospital, Southern EthiopiaBMC Res Notes20147155

15 

AK Labi AE Yawson GY Ganyaglo MJ Newman Prevalence and associated risk factors of asymptomatic bacteriuria in ante-natal clients in a large teaching hospital in GhanaGhana Medical Journal20154931541540855-032810.4314/gmj.v49i3.5African Journals Online (AJOL)https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v49i3.5

16 

Vaishali Jain Vinita Das Asymptomatic bacteriuria & obstetric outcome following treatment in early versus late pregnancy in north Indian womenIndian J Med Res20131374753758



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File  


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijmr.2020.017


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 2276

PDF Downloaded: 729