Get Permission Shethwala and Shah: Detection of anti DENV IgM and IgG antibodies by evaluating the rapid immunochromatographic technique in hospital at Himmatnagar, Gujarat


Introduction

Dengue is a virus borne illness which is arthropod. It is a distinct positive- marooned RNA virus of the family Flaviviridae; genus Flavivirus.1 DENV has four serotypes, DENV 1,2,3 and 4 which are antigenically different and DENV 5 was discovered in Malaysia in 2013.2 Primary infection is present as Dengue fever and Secondary infections as Dengue hemorrhagic fever. Primary and Secondary symptoms are caused by different serotypes.3 IgM detection is done to identify primary symptoms and IgG antibodies are detected to confirm secondary symptoms. Our study is mainly focused to determine the performance of a brisk immunochromatographic test tool for the recognition of antibodies IgG and IgM to DENV at a centre in Himmatnagar.

Materials and Methods

The samples of serum were collected from suspected patients having positive dengue symptoms.

Two groups were made for the patients with positive indications. The groups were framed as Group-I and Group-II respectively. There were 120 patients in group I while the second group comprised of 80 patients. Serum samples were collected from each patient. Serum sample from group I patient were treated to evaluate IgM antibody with the orientation IgM assess. The patients of Group-II having a total of eighty tasters were treated with a declared IgG assess. The outcomes of group-I convalescents and group-II patients were compared. Comparison were made between rapid test to that of reference test and sensitivity score was calculated.

Dengue duo cassette

It is a device used to perceive jointly IgG and IgM in a retiring inspection. It works on skill called immunochromatography. Confirmatory tasters craft a line in pink in the detection of IgG and IgM whereas pink line present in control position indicates negative sample.

Dengue IgM antibody capture ELISA

By this ELISA method we detect dengue specific IgM antibody. Reactive and non-reactive of sample is based on the relation of absorbance of sample to that of downbeat management. Reactive sample has ratio superior than or equivalent to 2.1, whereas negative samples have relation inferior or indistinguishable to 1.9 and quotients bigger than 1.9 however fewer than 2.1 were considered vacillating.

Dengue IgG antibody capture ELISA

Through this technique we detect the dengue specific IgG antibody. Samples are declared positive or negative on the basis of index value. If index value is more than 2.2 then sample is considered positive, and it is negative in case index value is less than 1.8. Tasters with index rate amidst 1.8 and 2.2 were calculated slanted. Rate of index is proportion of taster retention to cut-off consumption. Data of fusion proportions of IgG and IgM indication assess are brought in MS Excel and analyzed using version 12 of SPSS.

Table 1

Rapid test accuracy indices

Test Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) Positive predictive value (PPV) (95% CI) Negative predictive value (NPV) (95% CI) Positive likelihood ratio (+LR) Negative likelihood ratio (-LR) Diagnostic odd ratio (DOR) Accuracy (%)
IgM 79.25 (72.7-85.8) 64.55 (57.3-71.8) 57.35 (50.7-64.0) 84.75 (79.3-90.2) 2.7 0.28 11.5 78
IgG 82.8 (75.6-90.0) 57.95 (46.6-69.3) 64.25 (60.2-68.3) 71.7 (61.2-82.2) 1.72 0.17 13.0 70.1

[i] *Accuracy = TP+TN/TP+TN+FP+FN (TP-true positive, TN-true negative, FP- False positive, FN- False negative)

Result

120 samples from group I patients were selected for detection of anti dengue virus specific IgM antibody with reference IgM identification. The accuracy indices evaluated by comparing IgM detection by rapid devices and IgM capture assay is estimated and revealed in Table 1. 80 samples were selected for detection of dengue virus specific IgG antibody by rapid device and IgG capture assay. The readings for both the examinations were evaluated. In addition to exactness, index was recognized and portrayed in Table 1.

For the recognition of IgG and IgM, the sensitivity is 80% and 83% in that line. On the other, the specificity for exposure of IgG as well as IgM is 65% and 58% in that order. IgM keeps an inferior recognition rate with 57% in comparison with exposure of IgG which contains the rate of 64%. The negative prognostic rate for both IgM and IgG is 85% and 72% correspondingly. (Decimals either contracted or rounded off).

Discussion

Dengue viruses have been isolated in India in around 1960s.4 Dengue fever is the major concern in Gujarat und the India.5 This study was performed to identify the accuracy and sensitivity of rapid card test to that of reference capture assay. Performance and accuracy of rapid device can be improved by collecting paired tasters of blood amid sensitive as well as recuperative sera.6 Depiction of samples among heightened and restorative sera for recognition antibody (IgM) demonstrated advancement in specificity but sensitivity was found to have negligible expansion.7

Apart from the presence of mosquito vector in rainy seasons, incidence of a number of IgM dengue affirmative cases needs attention. Assemblage of water encourages transmission thus serving in the upholding of the vector populace during all seasons. Therefore, the incidence of dengue was reported all the round with a hike in rainy season.8

With rapid test by using paired serum specimen, all the samples collected were positive. By using first serum specimen only 71% of cases only showed positive by rapid test. Our study showed that IgM antibody titer is elevated by the day 5th of illness, same result was seen in previous some studies also.9, 10, 11 Secondary dengue virus contamination displayed lofty IgG with IgM or without IgM elevation.12

Conclusion

Our study concludes that rapid card test can be used for preliminary screening of dengue infection but not for confirmation of infection as it is not sensitive in comparison to antibody capture assay so we suggest not using rapid test as confirmatory tool but use only as preliminary investigation tool.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

C. Klungthong R. Putnak M.P. Mammen T. Li C. Zhang Molecular genotyping of dengue viruses by phylogenetic analysis of the sequences of individual genesJ Virol Methods20081541-2175810166-0934Elsevier BV

2 

M.S. Mustafa V. Rasotgi S. Jain V. Gupta Discovery of fifth serotype of dengue virus (DENV-5): A new public health dilemma in dengue controlMed J Armed Forces India201571167700377-1237Elsevier BV

3 

T. P. Monath Dengue: the risk to developed and developing countries.Proc Natl Acad Sci1994917239524000027-8424, 1091-6490Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

4 

T. P. Monath Dengue: the risk to developed and developing countries.Proc Natl Acad Sci1994917239524000027-8424, 1091-6490Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

5 

P Bharaj H S Chahar A Pandey K Diddi L Dar R Guleria Concurrent infections by all four dengue virus serotypes during an outbreak of dengue inVirol J200651

6 

S. D. Blacksell P. N. Newton D. Bell J. Kelley M. P. Mammen D. W. Vaughn The Comparative Accuracy of 8 Commercial Rapid Immunochromatographic Assays for the Diagnosis of Acute Dengue Virus InfectionClin Infect Dis20064281127341058-4838, 1537-6591Oxford University Press (OUP)

7 

T T Nga K T Thai H L Phuong P T Giao Hung Le Q Binh Evaluation of two rapid immunochromatographic assays for diagnosis of dengue among Vietnamese febrile patientsClin Vaccine Immunol200714799801

8 

P Reiter Climate change and mosquito-borne diseaseEnviron Health Perspect2001109suppl 1141610091-6765, 1552-9924Environmental Health Perspectives

9 

B. L. Innis S. Suntayakorn S. Nimmannitya C. H. Hoke V. Chongswasdi P. Puttisri An Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay to Characterize Dengue Infections Where Dengue and Japanese Encephalitis Co-CirculateAm J Trop Med Hyg1989404418270002-9637, 1476-1645American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

10 

Krangsak Ruechusatsawat Kouichi Morita Mariko Tanaka Suthon Vongsheree Sunthalee Rojanasuphot Paijit Warachit Daily observation of antibody levels among dengue patients detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA).Jpn J Trop Med Hyg19942219120304-2146, 2186-1811Japanese Society of Tropical Medicine

11 

David W. Vaughn Sharone Green Siripen Kalayanarooj Bruce L. Innis Suchitra Nimmannitya Saroj Suntayakorn Dengue in the Early Febrile Phase: Viremia and Antibody ResponsesJ Infect Dis19971762322300022-1899, 1537-6613Oxford University Press (OUP)

12 

S K Lam S Devi T Pang Detection of specific IgM in dengue infectionSoutheast Asian J Trop Med Public Health1987185328



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijmr.2020.033


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1756

PDF Downloaded: 673