Get Permission Islahi, Sen, Agarwal, and Trivedi: Microbiological surveillance of dialysis unit-prefogging verses postfogging in a tertiary care hospital: A cross-sectional study


Introduction

Haemodialysis is the most effective modality in treatment of end stage renal disease (ESRD).1, 2 Patients undergoing the haemodialysis treatment are at a greater risk of acquiring systemic infections.3 Nosocomial infections (NIs) are infections acquired in a hospital or healthcare service unit that appear 48 hours or more after hospital admission or within 3 days after discharge.4 The hand contact surfaces, floors, and air of the hospital environments are the main source of different pathogens that can cause Nis. 5, 6 About 5% to 10% of admitted patients to modern hospitals in the western countries acquire one or more Nis.7, 8 In contrast, the magnitude of NIs is much higher in the developing countries due to different reasons9 like poor ventilation system, high dusting, overcrowded setting, spread through sneezing and coughing, high movement of personnel, and suboptimal management of the hospital environment.10 The hospital environment is the highest dissemination reservoir of pathogenic microbes which cause big challenges in the hospital environment, particularly in terms of NIs because it contains diverse population of microorganisms.10 This study provides was done to evaluate the microbiological surveillance of Dialysis Unit both prefogging and postfogging by air culture and swab cultures.

Materials and Methods

Study setting, design, and period

An observational retrospective study was undertaken on microbiological surveillance of dialysis unit from April 2018 to December 2019 (21 months) at the department of Microbiology in a super specialty Post Graduate institute. The hospital has 2 Heamodailysis Units, 2 isolation rooms and one Peritoneal Dialysis Unit.

The method of sampling is Air culture for bacterial and fungal organisms. Airborne bacteria and fungi were sampled using AccuBasTM Ax1, a microbial air monitoring system based on Andersen Impaction Principle. The general operating principle is that air is sucked through the sampling port and strikes on agar plate. The air is aspirated through the sieves of the perforated lid of the air sampler and the petri dish containing growth medium sits in a holder and the perforated lid locks in place over the medium. A fan mechanism is placed below and draws air in through the lid. The resulting air stream directly impacts the petri dish, forcing the microorganisms to stick to the surface of the agar. After a collection cycle the petri dish is incubated and the colonies are counted and expressed as colony forming units (cfu/m3).

The air sampler was located approximately 100 cm away from the patient’s bed (at the height of 91 cm). The air samples were collected for a period of 10 minutes. After each sampling, the culture plates were immediately transferred to the laboratory and incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. The number of grown colonies on each plate was recorded and the concentration of the airborne bacteria and fungi were calculated following the process of culturing in certain air volume (m3). The results were expressed as colony-forming units per volume of sampled air. Finally, the mean levels of airborne bacteria and fungi in the haemodialysis centre were compared with the European Union Good Manufacturing Practices Guidelines (≤ 1 cfu/m3 in class A rooms and ≤ 100 cfu/m3 in class C rooms).11

Swabs are taken from bed, dialysis machine, dressing trolley, cardiac table, nursing counter of the dialysis Unit. After each sampling, swabs were immediately transferred to the laboratory and culture was done on Blood agar and MacConkey Agar culture plates and incubated at 37 °C for 24hours. Sterile precautions were taken while processing the samples. Identification of isolates from positive culture was done as per standard tests for identification, by Gram staining, motility and biochemical tests like catalase, coagulase, indole, methyl red, Voges-Proskauer, citrate, urease, phenyl pyruvic acid test and oxidase test. Antibiotic resistance testing of isolates was performed by modified Kirby Bauer’s disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar as per CLSI 2018 and EUCAST guidelines. All the culture media, biochemical media and antibiotic discs used were obtained from Hi Media.

These procedures were repeated prefogging and post fogging so as to evaluate the complete microbiological surveillance. The fogging was done by Microgen's “D-125”, is recommended for use as a non porous hard surface disinfectant in hospitals and other healthcare facilities, every month and the samples were processed n the department of Microbiology of the institute.

Ethics

All applicable institutional guidelines for the study were followed. It was entirely an observational study. This retrospective study was approved by Institutional ethical committee.

Result

Total of 42 Air culture (21 pre and 21 postfogging) and 588 swab culture (294 pre and 294 post fogging) samples were received in the microbiology department between a period of 21 months (from April 2018 to December 2019) from the dialysis unit of the hospital. The mean bacterial and fungal load were evaluated and calculated.

Prefogging results (Table 1) were within the normal limits and the load was futher reduced postfogging (Table 2), according to standard guidelines. Aerobic culture and antibiotic resistance pattern of surface swab cultures were done, out of which 11 (32.34%) prefogging swab culture samples, showed single growth of gram positive bacteria that were reduced to no growth post fogging.

Air culture

Table 1

The mean bacterial and fungal load - pre fogging, from the dialysis unit of the hospital

Pre-fogging

Site

Mean bacterial cfu/m3

Mean fungal load cfu/m3

Haemodialysis unit I

43.5 cfu/m3

1.42 cfu/m3

Haemodialysis unit II

43.85 cfu/m3

1.14 cfu/m3

Isolation ward I

12.85 cfu/m3

0.28 cfu/m3

Isolation ward II

16.28 cfu/m3

1.57 cfu/m3

Peritoneal dialysis Unit

44.5 cfu/m3

1.34 cfu/m3

Table 2

The mean bacterial and fungal load - post fogging was from the dialysis unit of the hospital

Post-Fogging

Site

Mean bacterial cfu/m3

Mean fungal load cfu/m3

Haemodialysis unit I

12.41cfu/m3

1.08 cfu/m3

Haemodialysis unit II

7.58 cfu/dm2

0.5 cfu/m3

Isolation ward I

10.41 cfu/dm2

0.25 cfu/m3

Isolation ward II

2 cfu/dm2

0.25 cfu/m3

Peritoneal dialysis Unit

13.5 cfu/m3

0.5 cfu/m3

According to the European Union Good Manufacturing Practices guidelines, Haemodialysis centres are placed in the class C of air surveillance standards (≤ 100 CFU/m3).11

According to the European Union Good Manufacturing Practices guidelines, Haemodialysis centres are placed in the class C of air surveillance standards (≤ 100 CFU/m3).11

Standards & guidelines

As per USP chapter <1116> microbial limits for sterile products are as follows:-

Table 3

Class

CFU/m3 air

10,000

<20

100,000

<100

  1. Class 10,000:-

Class 100,000:- particle count not to exceed a total or 100,000 particle per cubic foot of a size 0.5µ and larger or 700 particle per cubic foot of a size 5.0µ and larger.

Bacterial load from surface

The mean aerobic colony count (ACC) from surfaces in the dailysis unit were under acceptable limits, at <5 cfu/cm2 except from cardiac table and dressing trolley in haemodailysis unit I which showed the growth of Methicillin Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (11 cfu/cm2) and Methicillin Sensitive Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (13 cfu/cm2) respectively in pre-fogging samples. That also showed no growth post-fogging. No bacteria were isolated from the dialysis unit post fogging.

Discussion

Different studies had reported that air and hand contact surfaces of the healthcare service units are contaminated by different pathogens which might serve as source of infections. This study was carried out to gain an insight into the distribution, frequency, bacterial load, and antimicrobial susceptibility profile of pathogens at the setting of dialysis unit of, one of the busiest hospitals in North India.

The mean bacterial and fungal load pre and post fogging was evaluated for a period of 21 months (from April 2018 to December 2019) in the dialysis unit of the hospital.

According to the European Union Good Manufacturing Practices guidelines, Haemodialysis centres are placed in the class C of air surveillance standards (≤ 100 CFU/m3).11 In the present study, the total mean (±SD) of airborne bacterial colony count in the haemodialysis centre was within the normal limits post fogging which indicates suitable air conditions in the haemodialysis centre. The results of the total count of bacteria in the air and the pattern of isolated bacteria were consistent with other studies conducted in health centres and other wards such as intensive care units.12, 13

The aerobic surface swab culture results revealed optimal limits prefogging except from cardiac table and dressing trolley in haemodailysis unit I which showed the growth of Methicillin Resistant Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (11 cfu/cm2) and Methicillin Sensitive Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (13 cfu/cm2) respectively two times in the period of evaluation, which was reduced to no growth post fogging. All other surfaces showed no growth. This finding is relatively lower than other similar studies done in Ethiopia and abroad in Nigeria that reported bacterial growth at 52.9% and 65.7%, respectively.14, 15 In the present study, all of the isolates were gram positive which is in line with previous studies done in Ayder Hospital, Ethiopia, that reported 87.3%.16 In contrast, lower distribution of gram positives at 43.1% was reported in Hawassa, Ethiopia.17 The air bioload and aerobic surface swab culture results in the study revealed optimal limits, this shows that surface and aerial disinfection is proper in the dialysis unit as patients undergoing the haemodialysis treatment are at a greater risk of acquiring systemic infections.

Conclusion

Dialysis Unit is an important part of the hospital to have optimum conditions for the dialysis of critical patients. Patients undergoing the haemodialysis treatment are at a greater risk of acquiring infections. Therefore, periodic surveillance programs for microbiological qualification in haemodialysis centres can also lead to a better planning for disinfection of dialysis units.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

H Ebrahimi M Sadeghi F Amanpour A Dadgari Influence of nutritional education on hemodialysis patients' knowledge and quality of lifeSaudi J Kidney Dis Transpl20162722505

2 

A Dadgari L Dadvar H Eslam-Panah Multidimensional Fatigue Syndrome and Dialysis Adequacy among Elderly Patients under Hemodialysis TreatmentInt J Health Stud20151258

3 

KC Abbott LY Agodoa Etiology of bacterial septicaemia in chronic dialysis patients in the United StatesClin Nephrol200156212431

4 

SS Magill JR Edwards W Bamberg Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infectionsNew Engl JMed20143701311981208

5 

MN Kurutkan O Kara IH Eraslan An implementation on the social cost of hospital acquired infectionsInt J Clin Exp Med201583443343

6 

DJ Weber D Anderson WA Rutala The role of the surface environment in healthcare-associated infectionsCurr Opin Infect Dis201326433844

7 

JB Sarma GU Ahmed Infection control with limited resources: why and how to make it possible?Indian J Med Microbiol201028111

8 

S Melaku M Kibret B Abera S Gebre-Sellassie Antibiogram of nosocomial urinary tract infections in FelegeHiwot referral hospitalAfr Health Sci20121221349

9 

M Ogwang D Paramatti T Molteni Prevalence of hospital-associated infections can be decreased effectively in developing countriesJ Hosp Infect201384213842

10 

UK Muhammad MA Isa ZM Aliyu Distribution of potential nosocomial pathogens isolated from environments of four selected hospital in SokotoJ Microbiol Biotechnol Res2013313943

11 

EudraLex. “The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union (EU)” (Vol 4), Guidelines of Good Manufacturing Practices for medicinal products for human and veterinary usehttp://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/eudralex/vol-4/index_en.htm)

12 

ZG Nunes AS Martins AL Altoe MM Nishikawa MO Leite PF Aguiar Indoor air microbiological evaluation of offices, hospitals, industries and shopping centersMem Inst Oswaldo Cruz200510043517

13 

PY Huang ZY Shi CH Chen W Den HM Huang JJ Tsai Airborne and surface-bound microbial contamination in two intensive care units of a medical center in central TaiwanAerosol Air Qual Res201313310609

14 

A Gelaw SS Gebre M Tiruneh M Fentie Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from patients with post-operative surgical site infection, health professionals and Environmental samples at a tertiary level hospitalInt J Pharm Sci Res20133119

15 

A Maryam US Hadiza UM Aminu Characterization and determination of antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacteria isolated from some fomites in a teaching hospital in northern NigeriaAfr J Microbiol Res2014888148

16 

T Tesfaye Y Berhe K Gebreselassie Microbial contamination of operating Theatre at Ayder Referral Hospital, Northern EthiopiaInt J Pharma Sci Res201561012647

17 

L Diriba A Kassaye M Yared Antibiotics susceptibility pattern of hospital indoor airborne bacteria in Hawassa University Teaching and Referral Hospital, South EthiopiaInt J Modern Chem Appl Sci20163128792



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 20-01-2022

Accepted : 28-02-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2022.025


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 981

PDF Downloaded: 301



Medical Abbreviation List