Get Permission Patel, Singh, Yadav, Mevada, Rahate, and Nagoria: Optimization of sugar utilization by Azotobacter chroococcum in large scale fermentation for biomass production using response surface methodology


Introduction

Azotobacter chroococuum is a potent N2 fixer broad spectrum inoculants useful for various leguminous crops such as pigeonpea (Patel et al., 2020),1 mungbean (Yadav et al., 2019),2 chickpea (Wani et al., 2007)3 etc. and found to increase the percent of seed germination (Singh et al., 2014).4 Jensen’s medium is widely reported for the growth of nitrogen-fixing organisms are free-living bacteria. (Li et al., 2015).5 Successful pipeline of fermentation project with industrial fermentation economics almost 30% dependence on their media and their associated ingredient cost. (Islam and Hossain., 2012).6 Thereby, optimizing media and other associated fermentation parameter will lead us to durable sustenance for viable fermentation economics and efficient use of media resources. Previously, media optimization was successfully carried out for various bio fertilizers (Berruti et al., 2016).7 However, systematic study for optimizing of media is lacking with Azotobacter chroococuum for its applications at commercial level for biomass production. Additionally, optimization of Jenesen’s medium is one of the prerequisite for its commercial exploitation of A. chroococuum. Thereby, recent research efforts have focused on further process development or optimization and scale-up of A.chroococuum biomass production for large scale multiplication and flourish viable growth of bio-fertilizer.

In such case, response surface methodology is a powerful and proficient mathematical approach widely applied in the optimization of fermentation process, e.g. media components on various bio-fertilizer production (Latha et al., 2017),8 and production of other metabolites (Chuprom et al., 2016).9

Table 1

Level of the variable tested in central composite design

Variable

Unit

-1.682

-1

+1

1.682

Surose (X1)

S

3.18207

10

30

36.8179

K2HPO4 (X2)

K

0.494328

0.75

1.5

1.75567

FeSO4 (X3)

F

0.0494328

0.075

0.15

0.175567

Table 2

Experimental design matrix and results of central composite design

S. No

Type

Sucrose (X1)

K2HPO4 (X2)

FeSO4 (X3)

1

Fact

-1

-1

-1

2

Fact

1

-1

-1

3

Fact

-1

1

-1

4

Fact

1

1

-1

5

Fact

-1

-1

1

6

Fact

1

-1

1

7

Fact

-1

1

1

8

Fact

1

1

1

9

Axial

-1.68179

0

0

10

Axial

1.681793

0

0

11

Axial

0

-1.68179

0

12

Axial

0

1.681793

0

13

Axial

0

0

-1.68179

14

Axial

0

0

1.681793

15

Center

0

0

0

16

Center

0

0

0

17

Center

0

0

0

18

Center

0

0

0

19

Center

0

0

0

20

Center

0

0

0

Table 3

Analysis of variance for fitted quadric polynomial model

Source

Sum of Squares

DF

R2 Mean squire

F Value

p-value Prob > F

Model

0.017556

9

0.001951

1.579702

0.2430

X1-Sucrose

0.000531

1

0.000531

0.430252

0.5267

X2- K2HPO4

0.000147

1

0.000147

0.118858

0.7374

X3- FeSO4

0.003215

1

0.003215

2.603741

0.1377

X1X2

0.000181

1

0.000181

0.146173

0.7102

X1X3

0.00045

1

0.00045

0.364419

0.5595

X2X3

0.004141

1

0.004141

3.353062

0.0970

X1^2

1.04E-05

1

1.04E-05

0.008453

0.9286

X2^2

0.007825

1

0.007825

6.33676

0.0305

X3^2

0.000558

1

0.000558

0.451515

0.5168

[i] Std. Dev. Mean and C.V. analysis

Table 4

Std. Dev. Mean and C.V. analysis

Std. Dev.

0.03514

R-Squared

0.587072

Mean

0.21035

Adj R-Squared

0.215437

C.V. %

16.70564

Pred R-Squared

-2.20503

PRESS

0.095845

Adeq Precision

4.620833

Figure 1

Growth curve and association analysis; a: Explained the association between biomass (OD) or period of time; b: Corellation of sucrose cons and biomass (OD; c: Correlation of FeSo4. cons and biomass (OD); d: Corellation of K2HPO4 and biomass (OD); e: Corellation of manitol cons and biomass (OD); f: Corellation of Na2Mo4-7H2O cons and biomass (OD)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a0665913-4d28-4fac-82f0-f3b60aac1365/image/cca9a71c-b3ce-42d3-8c7f-fb8dc188b44d-uimage.png

In tabulated axial design of CCD in export design. The yield of A. chroococcum were determined for each set of experiments which were shown in Figure 2, among sets no 11 give high biomass and microscopy count (Figure 2 a). However, selected six sets form CCD were performed and among these sets no 1,11,12,16,17,18 give the high yields of A. chroococuum (Figure 2) there, these six sets were analysis in 3 liter Jar Fermenter, which mansion as 1,2,3,4,5,6 the high yields biomass of A. chroococuum in sets no 4 and 6 higher (Figure 3) in which amount of Sucrose 13.4 g, K2HPO4 1.05 gm and FeSO4 0.14 g.

Figure 2

Central composite design experimental set analysis; a: Central composite design set analysis for microscopy count and biomass (OD); b: Central composite design set analysis at 12 h for pH and biomass (OD); c: Central composite design set analysis at 36 h for pH and biomass (OD); d: Central composite design set analysis at 44 h for pH and biomass (OD); e: Central composite design set analysis at 56 h for pH and biomass; f: Central composite design set analysis at 64 h for pH and biomass (OD); g: Central composite design set analysis at 64 h for microscopy count and biomass (OD); h: Central composite design set analysis at 76 h for pH and biomass(OD)

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a0665913-4d28-4fac-82f0-f3b60aac1365/image/6ac39b46-efb3-455f-83a0-ebcdce4a8048-uimage.png

In present study, optimization of fermentation media of A. chroococuum was investigated using RSM to increase the biomass production, based on optimal medium, scale-up was carried out in a 3-L jar fermenter.

The strains of A. chroococcum used in the present study collected from bio-fertilizer production unit Cordet, IFFCO, Kalol, Gujarat, India. Medium mainly used for A. chroococuum optimization is Jenson’ medium. A loopful strain of A. chroococcum from the slant were transferred into a 250-ml conical flask and incubated for 24 h on a rotary shaker operating at 200 rpm at 30ºC. It was then inoculated into 3-L jar fermenter (Biostat M.B. Braun Co., Germany) in shake flask culture, fermenter culture, it was incubated at 30ºC, the agitation speed was controlled at 400 rpm.

After 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 74 h, fermentation broth was collected and cells were removed by centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 min; the supernatant was collected and further diluted by a factor of 10 with Mili-Q water, this diluents sample was checked for microscopic and spectrophotometer analysis.

Central Composite design (CCD) is one of the response surface methodologies (Ghelich et al., 2019)10 for identification of the components affecting the biomass production of A. chroococcum yield significantly, a CCD was adopted to optimize the major variables (Sucrose, K2HPO4 and FeSO4) (Table 1). A 23 - factorial CCD, with six axial points (a= 1.682) and six replications at the centre points (n0=6) leading to a total number of 20 experiments was employed (Table 2) for the optimization of the three chosen medium variables. A. chroococcum yield was used as the dependent output variable.

The experiments were performed in duplicate with the mean values taken for analysis. Design Expert trial Software was used for multiple regression analysis of the experimental data obtained. F-test was employed to evaluate the statistical significance of the quadric polynomial, and multiple coefficients of correlation R and the determination coefficient of correlation R2 were calculated to evaluate the performance of the regression equation.

In the growth curve increase time interval growth of A. chroococcum biomass increase up to 72 hour after time interval it can achieve stationary phage (Figure 1 a). The different concentration of Sucrose, FeSO4, K2HPO4, Manitol, Na2MoO4.7H2O, where check in which 15 gm sucrose give high biomass of the A. chroococcum (Figure 1 b) while in case of the K2HPO4, if we increase K2HPO4, cons biomass of A. chroococcum also increase (Figure 1 d) and in case of FeSO4 Manitol and Na2MoO4-7H2O biomass of A. choococcum is increase up to certain level as in FeSO4 up to 0.1 gm Manitol up to 12.5 gm and Na2MoO4.7H2O is up to 0.1 mg, (Figure 1 .c, 1.e, 1.f) and above this level biomass of A. choococcum decrease.

Figure 3

Explanation of selected six set from central composite design; a: Selected set analysis at 12h for biomass and pH; b: Selected set analysis at 24h for biomass and pH; c: Selected set analysis at 48h for biomass and pH; d: Selected set analysis at 56h for biomass and pHc- Selected set analysis at 48h for biomass and pH; e: Selected set analysis at 72h for biomass and pH; f: Selected set analysis at 72h for microscopy count and biomass

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a0665913-4d28-4fac-82f0-f3b60aac1365/image/11d538ad-bab6-4d28-bebe-d6c73d5a621a-uimage.png

Figure 4

a: 3-D curve analysis for sucrose, K2HPO4 and FeSo4; b: 3-D curve analysis for FeSo4 and K2HPO4 for biomass production; c: 3-D curve analysis for sucrose and FeSo4 for biomass production

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a0665913-4d28-4fac-82f0-f3b60aac1365/image/5f77eeaa-c2fb-4398-8827-0827268b8e7b-uimage.png

The model’s goodness of fit was checked by determination coefficient (R2), in this case, the value of the determination coefficient (R=0.59) (Table 4) indicated that only 16.70% of the total variations were not explained by the model. The value of the adjusted determination coefficient [Adj(R2)= 0.22] (Table 4) was also very high in supporting the high significance of the model. Among the model terms, X1, X2, X3 and X were significant with a probability of 99%; X2 X1 were significant with a probability of 95% (Table 3). The fitted response for the above regression model was plotted in (Figure 4) 3D graphs were generated for the pair-wise combination of the three factors while keeping the other one at its optimum levels for A. chroococcum production graphs are given here to highlight the roles played by various factors and also to emphasize the roles played by the physical constraints vis-à-vis the biosynthetic aspect in the final yield of the A. chroococcum.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Acknowledgement

Author would like to acknowledge Research and development department, Indian farmer fertilizer cooperative limited, Kalol, Gujarat, India for providing research facility and research environment.

References

1 

KA Patel K Panchchigar RK Saxena RK Varshney A Bohra Understanding molecular divergence and population structure of parental lines of CMS hybrids in pigeonpeaJ Food Legumes20203328292

2 

SK Yadav R Prabha V Singh R Bajpai B Teli M Rashid Microbes-mediated nutrient use efficiency in pulse cropsMicrob Interv Agric Environ20194476010.1007/978-981-32-9084-6_20

3 

PA Wani MS Khan A Zaidi Synergistic effects of the inoculation with nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria on the performance of field-grown chickpeaJ Plant Nutr Soil Sci200717022837

4 

N Singh B Agarwal CB Majumder Comparative studies on simultaneous biodegradation of phenol and cyanide using different strainsInt J Eng Res Appl20144382731

5 

W Li LL Jiang N Mika T Shigeyuki XG Cheng Excessive ammonia inhibited transcription of MsU2 gene and furthermore affected accumulation distribution of allantoin and amino acids in alfalfa Medicago sativaJ Integr Agric2015147126982

6 

MT Islam MM Hossain D Maheshwari Plant Probiotics in Phosphorus Nutrition in Crops, with Special Reference to RiceBacteria in Agrobiology: Plant ProbioticsSpringerBerlin, Heidelberg201232563

7 

A Berruti E Lumini R Balestrini V Bianciotto Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as natural biofertilizers: let's benefit from past successesFront Microbiol20166155910.3389/fmicb.2015.01559

8 

S Latha G Sivaranjani D Dhanasekaran Response surface methodology: A non-conventional statistical tool to maximize the throughput of Streptomyces species biomass and their bioactive metabolitesCrit Rev Microbiol201743556782

9 

J Chuprom P Bovornreungroj M Ahmad D Kantachote S Dueramae Approach toward enhancement of halophilic protease production by Halobacterium sp. strain LBU50301 using statistical design response surface methodologyBiotechnol Rep (Amst)2016101728

10 

R Ghelich MR Jahannama H Abdizadeh FS Torknik MR Vaezi Central composite design (CCD)-Response surface methodology (RSM) of effective electrospinning parameters on PVP-B-Hf hybrid nanofibrous composites for synthesis of HfB2-based composite nanofibersComposites Part B Eng2019166152741



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 06-12-2022

Accepted : 15-12-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2022.052


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 723

PDF Downloaded: 240