Get Permission Paralkar, Godbole, and Mundhe: Cardiac implantable electronic device infection: Microbiology and antibiotic prophylaxis


Introduction

Permanent pacemakers (PPMs), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), and cardiac resynchronizing therapy (CRT) devices are examples of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Compared to low-income nations, high-income nations have a higher rate of CIED implantation. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation rate in India is approximately 0.3 per 100,000 people, while the permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation rate in India is approximately 3.3 per 100,000 people.1 Septicaemia, pocket abscess, and skin erosion of the pulse generator or electrode can all result from CIED or PPM insertion. Nearly 40,000 CIED are implanted annually in India.2 A survey by Indian Society of Electro cardiology and the Indian Heart Rhythm Society found Pacemaker for bradyarrhythmia was the most common (80%) of the devices implanted.3

After implanting a permanent pacemaker, infection-related complications that necessitate a second operation are less likely to occur if antibiotic prophylaxis is taken. S aureus, E coli, E faecalis, and S epidermidis are among the organisms that are ineffective.4 Prevalence of these organisms can differ by countries. Diabetes, chronic renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal procedures, and immunosuppressive therapy are all potential risk factors for CIED infections.5

Risk Factors of CIED Infection

  1. Patient factors: Comorbidities (renal failure, heart failure, diabetes), fever within 24 hours before the implantation, anticoagulation, and steroid use.

  2. Device-related risk factors: Use of more than two pacing leads and the need for early pocket re-exploration can cause central venous thrombosis.

  3. Procedure-related factors: Procedure time, temporary pacemaker use prior to implantation, early re-intervention and postoperative haematoma at the device pocket site.6

Table 1

Microbiology in CIED infections

S.No.

Study type

Most

Least

1.

Prospective7 Didier Klug (1997)

S. aureus, S. epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa 

2.

Cohort8  Daniel Z. Uslan et al (2007)

S aureus, Ecoli, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, CoNS, Strep pneumoniae

Pseudomonas

3.

Prospective9 Antoine Da Costa (1998)

Staphylococcus, epidermidis, hominis, haemolyticus, Enterobacter aerogenes, Serratia marcescens

Enterobacter aerogenes, Serratia marcescens

4.

Prospective10 Eugene Y Fu. (1999)

S. aureus, S. epidermidis

5.

Prospective11 Jimmy Dy Chua 2000

CoNS, S. aureus

6.

Cohort study12 (2016) Ayman A. Hussein

MRSA (33.8%), CoNS (37.6%)

Enterococci, staphylococci, anaerobes, fungi, mycobacteria

7.

201313

Staph. Aureus (66%), gram positive cocci (14%)

E coli (3%)

8.

Abdulla Fakhro, 201614

CoNS(42%), MSSA (25%)

MRSA (4%), Fungal (2%)

[i] * CIED - Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections

Diagnostic workup for suspected CIED infection

Pre-operative

  1. It is necessary to obtain a complete blood count, procalcitonin levels, C reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

  2. Sets of blood samples before initiating empirical antibiotic therapy.

    1. Blood cultures for aerobic, anaerobic and candida species should be sent.

    2. One Bactec plus one aerobic/F bottle and one Bactec lytic/10 anaerobic/F bottle of blood should be taken and incubated for five days on an automated Bactec FX instrument.

    3. Blood cultures of fungal and mycobacterial organisms in culture-negative CIED infections; with immunocompromised hosts and central venous catheters.

  3. Transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) should be performed in patients with positive blood cultures or who have systemic symptoms but negative blood cultures as a result of previous antibiotic therapy.

Intra-operative

  1. Swab samples from the device for gram stain, and bacterial culture sensitivity.

    1. If suspected, consider fungal and mycobacterial cultures and acid-fast bacillus (AFB) smears.

  2. Generator pocket tissue samples for culture and susceptibility testing.

  3. Device sonication.

    1. Place the extracted device into a sterile jar/container with 50 to 100 ml of sterile saline and seal before submitting to the microbiology laboratory.15

Table 2

Antimicrobial prophylaxis used in different studies (2010-2023)

S.No.

Study

Antimicrobial prophylaxis

Time/Duration

1.

Cohort (2019)16

Cephalosporin - cefazolin, cefuroxime Alternatives: vancomycin (also for MRSA), clindamycin

1 hr prior 2 hrs prior

2.

Review17 (2022) Post - OP Early management

Cephalexin TMP/SMX, Clindamycin

7-10 days

3.

Review18

Vancomycin / Daptomycin

Duration varies according to infection

4.

Update from AHA (2020)19

Cefazolin (1-2 gm), vancomycin (15mg/kg), Flucloxacillin (1-2gm) 1st line Vancomycin 2nd line Daptomycin or Linezolid

Cefazolin (1 hr prior), vancomycin (2 hrs prior) Should be tailored according to sensitivity reports.

5.

Sohail MR et al, (2022)20

Cefazolin 1gm, vancomycin

Cephazolin 1hr prior

6.

Cohort study, Kabulski GM et al (2019) 21

Cephalexin (44.3%), doxycycline (10.9%), Clindamycin (8.1%), trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (4.5%)

Post OP- Vancomycin for 14 days (prior MRSA) infection) Cephalexin for 14 days (with existing ICD) 

7.

Michael Koutentakis et al. (2014)22

Vancomycin, teicoplanin, ciprofloxacin

40-57 days post operative

8.

201123

Cephazolin (1st generation cephalosporin)/ Vancomycin (if oxacillin resistant staphylococci) Linezolid/daptomycin (if allergic to all above)

Cephazolin (1hr prior) Vancomycin (90-120min prior) Duration after CIED removal:

1. 10-14 days pocket site infection

2. 14 days blood stream infection

3. 4-6 weeks complicated infections

9.

2011 review24

Cloxacillin / cephalexin

1. Suspected endocarditis with >2 cm vegetation 

7-14 days according to blood culture reports.

1. 24-72 hrs post extraction of device, 7-14 days for re-implantation depending upon bacteraemia.

10.

Post operative management (2017)25

1. Cefazolin

2. Vancomycin (If not tolerating above antibiotics)

3. Levofloxacin

1. 2gm IV over 5 mins of incision repeated intraoperatively after 3 hrs.

2.1gm IV over 60 min, repeated at every 6 hrs if procedure is ongoing.

3.500 mg every 24 hrs for 2 doses.

12.

Retrospective cohort study26

Vancomycin (83.1%), daptomycin (12.0%), linezolid (2.4%), cephalosporins (1.7%), rifampin (35.6%), gentamicin (14.0%)

Pathogenesis of Infection

During implantation or subsequent manipulation, lead and/or pulse generator contamination can result in cardiac implantable electronic device infections.9 The host, microorganism, or device can all play a role in the infection of the cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). The air in the operating room, the patient's own skin flora, the materials used to make the surfaces of CIED polymers—silicone and polyvinylchloride adhere better than polytetrafluoroethylene, whereas polyurethane does not adhere as well as polyethylene does. In metals steel shows more bacterial adherence than titanium.19 The organisms isolated mostly were Gram-positive bacteria (70–90%), especially Coagulase Negative Staphylococci (37.6% of the isolates) and Staphylococcus aureus (30.8%), gram negative rods, Enterobacteriaceae and fungi were rare. This may differ from hospital to hospital or country to country. Studies of CIED infections have shown 33.8% Methicillin Resistant S aureus, 37.6% coagulase negative staphylococci. In Italy, 92.5 percent of isolates were gram positives, while coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were found in 69% of cases and S. aureus in 13.8%. Lead or lead material cultures, blood cultures, pocket tissue cultures, and pocket swab cultures can all be used to identify the source of infection.12 Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads studied where the duration of antibiotic therapy before lead ablation was 9.7±6.1 days in patients with a positive lead culture versus 15.3±6.2 days in patients with a negative lead culture.7

Clinical Diagnosis

There are four types of CIED infection: Patients with

  1. Local inflammatory changes at the generator pocket site, such as erythema, swelling, pain, discomfort, drainage, or erosion of the generator and/or leads through the skin.

  2. Fever and no local changes at the generator pocket site.

  3. Bacteraemia and no local changes at the generator pocket site.

  4. Lead thrombus or vegetation on echocardiography.15

Discussion

Antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the risk of complications which require repeat operation.4 Before insertion of CIED it should be ensured that patients do not have signs of infection. CIED infections are differentiated as Pocket Hematoma, Post-implantation inflammation, Superficial infection of surgical wound and uncomplicated pocket infection.27 The use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis has varied from cefazolin to higher end or restricted antibiotics. Vancomycin is an alternative for patients who are allergic to cephalosporins of the first generation. Additionally, daptomycin or linezolid are alternatives if patient is allergic to both vancomycin and first-generation cephalosporin.28 Antibiotics taken post-operatively do not significantly differ from pre-operative antibiotics. One case with a history of MRSA received vancomycin for 14 days and another one with existing ICD received 14 days of cephalexin prophylaxis. Another patient with prior methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteraemia as a result of infected haemodialysis fistula, received 14 days of vancomycin for initial placement of a single-chamber pacemaker prophylaxis.21 If superficial infection is suspected, oral empirical antibiotics can be started for 14 days after collection of blood samples. The pocket infection should be differentiated clinically from soft tissue infection, hematoma and allergic reactions to dressings, tapes or disinfectants. Monotherapy with  cephalexin, clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, linezolid or cephalexin in combination with doxycycline or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are suggested options. The use of Linezolid is restricted to infectious disease specialists.18 The treatment should cover Staphylococcus aureus as it is most common in CIED infections. Due to the lack of current data on MRSA prevalence and use, treatment decisions should be based on the institution's or patients' risk.19 The duration of antimicrobial therapy varies from 6 weeks in valve vegetation or septic phlebitis and osteomyelitis to 2 weeks in CIED erosion through skin without obvious purulence.18 Yeast infections are rare. But candida species are most frequent including C. parapsilosis and C. albicans. In these cases, empirical amphotericin B, either with or without 5-flucytosine, or an echinocandin, can be used as the first line of treatment. It can be then deescalated to fluconazole 400–800 mg daily according to sensitivity of microorganisms or negative cultures.29 Complete device removal is the only effective measure for the eradication of CIED infections.  Michael Koutentakis et al. the study has treated 6 CIED infections caused by staph species; the postoperative course of antibiotics was 40-57 days.22

Conclusion

Antibiotic prophylaxis has reduced the infections associated with CIED. In the complicated infections extraction of CIED system remains the option. Though staphylococcus species are leading cause in infections, empiric antimicrobial coverage should be decided based on clinical findings, epidemiologic factors and results of blood cultures and sensitivity. After collection of blood cultures, antibiotics should be tailored according to sensitivity reports. 1st generation cephalosporins are usually recommended as empiric surgical prophylactic. As the antimicrobial resistance is at rise; the use of Vancomycin and Linezolid should be restricted to infectious disease specialists.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Z Sharif L M Ptaszek Global disparities in arrhythmia care: mind the gapHeart Rhythm O2202236Part B78392

2 

S Bohora A Vora A Kapoor V Arora N Naik R Selvaraj Consensus statement for implantation and follow-up of cardiac implantable electronic devices in IndiaIndian Pacing Electrophysiol J201818618892

3 

J Shenthar S Bohra V Jetley A Vora Y Lokhandwala A Nabar A survey of cardiac implantable electronic device implantation in India: By Indian Society of Electrocardiology and Indian Heart Rhythm SocietyIndian Heart J20166816871

4 

JP Mounsey MJ Griffith M Tynan FK Gould AF Macdermott RG Gold Antibiotic prophylaxis in permanent pacemaker implantation: a prospective randomised trialBr Heart J199472433943

5 

G Datta A study on pacemaker pocket infectionJ Cardiol Cardiovasc Med20205569

6 

KG Tarakji CR Ellis P Defaye C Kennergren Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in patients at riskArrhythm Electrophysiol Rev2016516571

7 

AA Hussein Y Baghdy OM Wazni MP Brunner G Kabbach M Shao Microbiology of cardiac implantable electronic device infectionsJACC Clin Electrophysiol201624498505

8 

SK Mulpuru VG Pretorius UM Birgersdotter-Green Device infections: management and indications for lead extractionCirculation2013128910318

9 

A Fakhro F Jalalabadi RH Brown SA Izaddoost Treatment of infected cardiac implantable electronic devicesSemin Plast Surg2016302605

10 

D Klug D Lacroix C Savoye L Goullard D Grandmougin JL Hennequin Systemic infection related to endocarditis on pacemaker leads: clinical presentation and managementCirculation19979582098107

11 

AD Costa H Lelièvre G Kirkorian M Célard P Chevalier F Vandenesch Role of the preaxillary flora in pacemaker infections: a prospective studyCirculation1998971817915

12 

DZ Uslan MR Sohail JL Sauver PA Friedman DL Hayes SM Stoner Permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator infection: a population-based studyArch Intern Med2007167766975

13 

EY Fu RK Shepard Permanent pacemaker infectionsCard Electrophysiol Rev19993139

14 

JD Chua BL Wilkoff I Lee N Juratli DL Longworth SM Gordon Diagnosis and management of infections involving implantable electrophysiologic cardiac devicesAnn Intern Med200013386048

15 

DC Desimone MR Sohail Approach to diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable-electronic-device infectionJ Clin Microbiol2018567168317

16 

GM Kabulski A Northup BS Wiggins Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis following cardiac implantable electronic device placementJ Innov Card Rhythm Manag2019108377784

17 

M Koutentakis S Siminelakis P Korantzopoulos A Petrou E Priavali A Mpakas Surgical management of cardiac implantable electronic device infectionsJ Thorac Dis2014611739

18 

MS Dimitris RM Das Infections of Permanent Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-DefibrillatorsModern Pacemakers - Present and FutureInTech201138110.5772/556

19 

PA Gould LJ Gula R Yee AC Skanes GJ Klein AD Krahn Cardiovascular implantable electrophysiological device-related infections: a reviewCurr Opin Cardiol2011261611

20 

L Marriott J Poole LW Larson Postoperative ManagementSurgical Implantation of Cardiac Rhythm Devices (e book)ElsevierNetherlands2017237

21 

KM Talha H Ishaq R Ramesh W Arshad V Arshad LM Baddour Association between high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia - A retrospective cohort studyEur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis2021407150310

22 

PK Goel P Rajput AK Sahu R Khanna N Garg S Tewari Incidence, management patterns, and outcomes of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infection-A retrospective registry-based analysisJ Indian Coll Cardiol202212415661

23 

PA Pagore SA Gaidhane Effects and Complications of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: A Narrative ReviewCureus20221410e30170

24 

P Phillips AD Krahn JG Andrade S Chakrabarti CR Thompson DJ Harris Treatment and Prevention of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) InfectionsCJC Open202241194658

25 

C Blomström-Lundqvist V Traykov PA Erba H Burri JC Nielsen MG Bongiorni European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections-endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Europace202022451549

26 

CB Cunha Schlossberg's Clinical Infectious DiseaseOxford University PressOxford2022

27 

F Toriello M Saviano A Faggiano D Gentile G Provenzale AV Pollina Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Infection Assessment, Diagnosis and Management: A Review of the LiteratureJ Clin Med20221119589810.3390/jcm11195898

28 

LM Baddour AE Epstein CC Erickson BP Knight ME Levison PB Lockhart Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart AssociationCirculation2010121345877

29 

A Halawa PD Henry FA Sarubbi Candida endocarditis associated with cardiac rhythm management devices: review with current treatment guidelinesMycoses201154416874



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 07-07-2023

Accepted : 23-08-2023


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2023.023


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 847

PDF Downloaded: 142



Medical Abbreviation List