Get Permission Aguirre-Sanchez, Irvin, Prieto-Alvarado, Chaidez, and Campo: Genomic perspective of Salmonella enterica isolated from farm animals in Sinaloa, Mexico


Introduction

Foodborne diseases persist as a globally prevalent human health concern. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), a complex consortium of microorganisms is responsible for 90% of illnesses, wherein Salmonella ranks second.1 This gram-negative bacterium encompasses more than 2,500 serovars, categorized into typhoidal and non-typhoidal Salmonella based on the associated disease syndrome, affecting humans and exhibiting a wide host range.2 Furthermore, Salmonella is deemed a ubiquitous bacterium, demonstrating a heightened prevalence in warm-blooded animals, notably in cattle, pigs, and poultry,3 which function as carriage animals even in the absence of clinical manifestations.4

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have projected an annual incidence of 1.35 million Salmonella infections in the United States.5 Remarkably, Mexico mirrors this epidemiological landscape. In the year 2020 alone, 64,778 cases were reported, encompassing instances of typhoid fever (25.4%), paratyphoid (84%), and other salmonellosis (66.2%).6 Furthermore, an examination of the past five decades in Mexico reveals a substantial surge from 7,629 to 45,280 infections. Notably, among the various Mexican states, Sinaloa holds the foremost position, exhibiting elevated rates of typhoid fever.7

Historically, epidemiological occurrences of Salmonella outbreaks have been ascribed to direct contact with animals or the ingestion of tainted animal-derived products, including meat, eggs, and milk.8 Consequently, antibiotic administration has traditionally served as the primary therapeutic approach for treating Salmonella infections, albeit with adverse consequences manifested in the gradual emergence of antibiotic resistance mechanisms. Presently, the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella strains has escalated to a critical juncture, posing a significant and pressing challenge.9

Another noteworthy facet pertains to Salmonella pathogenesis, intricately linked to the expression of virulence factor genes situated within distinct pathogenicity islands (SPI).10 A prominent component in this regard is the Type III secretion system (T3SS), recognized for its needle-like structure facilitating protein translocation within epithelial cells. This system is encoded by SPI-1 and SPI-2, playing pivotal roles in inducing cell attachment through cytoskeletal rearrangement, modulating host immune responses, ensuring intracellular survival, and facilitating invasion.11, 12

Within this framework, a One Health approach has been advocated to investigate the interconnection among animals, the environment, and human health as primary focal points.13 Strategic initiatives, such as next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics, have significantly expanded our understanding of the fundamental genomic characteristics of pathogens, enabling timely identification a crucial element in the intervention of foodborne outbreaks.14 In alignment with the overarching goal of One Health, the objective of this study is to scrutinize the genomic population structure to infer certain genotypic traits associated to the Mexican isolates through the utilization of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and a bioinformatic methodology applied to S. enterica isolates obtained from farm animals.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains

In this study, a total of 72 S. enterica strains isolated from asymptomatic farm animals’ manure, specifically cattle (n=38), poultry (n=17), and goat (n=17) sourced from the Culiacán Valley in Sinaloa, were employed (Table 1). The strains under investigation were procured from the private collection of the National Food Safety Laboratory (LANIIA) at the Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo (CIAD) in Culiacán, México. DNA extraction was conducted utilizing the DNAeasy Blood & Tissue Culture commercial kit, following the manufacturer's protocols. The concentration of the extracted DNA was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA Broad Range Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher, USA). Subsequently, the Nextera XT DNA sample kit was employed for library preparation, and genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina Miseq platform (Illumina, Inc.) to acquire paired-end reads (2x150 bp).

Reads quality control and assembly

The initial assessment of sequencing-derived reads quality was conducted using FASTQC.15 Subsequently, Trimmomatic V0.3216 was employed to trim sequences of suboptimal quality, defined as those falling below a Phred quality score per base of 20. Furthermore, reads with lengths less than 100 base pairs and adapters were eliminated. The de novo assembly of reads was accomplished through the A5-miseq pipeline17 utilizing the paired-end reads as input. The generated assemblies were uploaded to NCBI under the PRJNA313928 BioProject.

Taxonomy and ST assignation

To validate taxonomy identity and predict sequence type (ST), the pubMLST website (REF) was used to compare Salmonella allelic profiles with the generated draft genomes. For serotype assignment, the stand-alone version of the Salmonella in silico typing resource (SISTR)18 was employed. To visually represent the diversity in ST and locus variant, a spanning tree was generated using the online version of PHYLOViZ.19

Table 1

Metadata associated with the 72 genomes of S. enterica isolated from farm animals in the Culiacán, Sinaloa region

Genome Number

Strain Name

Country

Predicted Serotype

Isolation Source

Isolation Site

1

CA-AGO08001

Mexico

Agona

Cow

La Cofradía

2

CA-AGO08002

Mexico

Agona

Cow

La Cofradía

3

CA-TYP08001

Mexico

Typhimirium

Chicken

Agua Caliente

4

CA-ORA08006

Mexico

Oranienburg

Chicken

Jotagua

5

CA-ORA08007

Mexico

Oranienburg

Cow

Jotagua

6

CA-ORA08008

Mexico

Oranienburg

Cow

Jotagua

7

CA-ORA08002

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

Jotagua

8

CA-ORA08003

Mexico

Oranienburg

Chicken

Jotagua

9

CA-ORA08004

Mexico

Oranienburg

Chicken

Jotagua

10

CA-JAV09001

Mexico

Javiana

Chicken

Jotagua

11

CA-SAI08001

Mexico

Saintpaul

Cow

Jotagua

12

CA-MUE08001

Mexico

Muenchen

Cow

Jotagua

13

CA-NEW08001

Mexico

Newport

Cow

Jotagua

14

CA-WEL08001

Mexico

Weltevreden

Chicken

Jotagua

15

CA-WEL08002

Mexico

Weltevreden

Chicken

Jotagua

16

CA-WEL08003

Mexico

Weltevreden

Chicken

Jotagua

17

CA-GIV08001

Mexico

Give

Cow

Jotagua

18

CA-GIV08002

Mexico

Give

Cow

Jotagua

19

CA-ORA08001

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

Jotagua

20

CA-ORA08005

Mexico

Oranienburg

Chicken

Jotagua

21

CA-ORA08009

Mexico

Oranienburg

Cow

Agua Caliente

22

CA-ORA08010

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

La Cofradía

23

CA-ORA08011

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

La Cofradía

24

CA-ORA08012

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

La Cofradía

25

CA-ORA08013

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

La Cofradía

26

CA-ORA08014

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

La Cofradía

27

CA-ORA08015

Mexico

Oranienburg

Cow

La Cofradía

28

CA-ORA08016

Mexico

Oranienburg

Cow

La Cofradía

29

CA-ORA08017

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

El Castillo

30

CA-ORA08018

Mexico

Oranienburg

Goat

El Castillo

31

CA-GAM08001

Mexico

Gaminara

Cow

El Castillo

32

CA-THO08001

Mexico

Thompson

Cow

Iraguato

33

CA-THO08002

Mexico

Thompson

Cow

Iraguato

34

CA-THO08003

Mexico

Thompson

Cow

El Castillo

35

CA-ALB08001

Mexico

Albany

Chicken

Jotagua

36

CA-MON08001

Mexico

Montevideo

Goat

La Cofradía

37

CA-LUC08001

Mexico

Luciana

Cow

El Castillo

38

CA-LUC08002

Mexico

Luciana

Cow

El Castillo

39

CA-LUC08003

Mexico

Luciana

Cow

El Castillo

40

CA-NEW08002

Mexico

Newport

Cow

Iraguato

41

CA-SAI08002

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

42

CA-SAI08004

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

43

CA-SAI08005

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

44

CA-SAI08006

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

45

CA-SAI08007

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

46

CA-SAI08008

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

47

CA-SAI08009

Mexico

Saintpaul

Cow

Agua Caliente

48

CA-MIN08001

Mexico

Minnesota

Cow

La Cofradía

49

CA-MIN08002

Mexico

Minnesota

Cow

Iraguato

50

CA-MIN08004

Mexico

Minnesota

Cow

Iraguato

51

CA-MIN08005

Mexico

Minnesota

Cow

Iraguato

52

CA-MIN08007

Mexico

Minnesota

Goat

El Castillo

53

CA-ANA08001

Mexico

Anatum

Goat

Jotagua

54

CA-ANA08002

Mexico

Anatum

Goat

Jotagua

55

CA-ANA08003

Mexico

Anatum

Goat

El Castillo

56

CA-ANA08004

Mexico

Anatum

Goat

El Castillo

57

CA-GIV09001

Mexico

Give

Goat

Jotagua

58

CA-GIV08003

Mexico

Give

Cow

Agua Caliente

59

CA-GIV08004

Mexico

Give

Cow

Agua Caliente

60

CA-GIV08005

Mexico

Give

Cow

Agua Caliente

61

CA-GIV08006

Mexico

Give

Cow

La Cofradía

62

CA-GIV08007

Mexico

Give

Cow

La Cofradía

63

CA-GIV09002

Mexico

Give

Cow

La Cofradía

64

CA-GIV08008

Mexico

Give

Cow

Iraguato

65

CA-GIV09003

Mexico

Give

Cow

El Castillo

66

CA-SAH08001

Mexico

Sahanina

Cow

El Castillo

67

CA-SAH08002

Mexico

Sahanina

Cow

El Castillo

68

CA-CAY09001

Mexico

Cayar

Cow

Jotagua

69

CA-MIN08003

Mexico

Minnesota

Cow

Iraguato

70

CA-MIN08006

Mexico

Minnesota

Goat

El Castillo

71

CA-MIN08008

Mexico

Minnesota

Cow

El Castillo

72

CA-SAI08003

Mexico

Saintpaul

Chicken

Agua Caliente

Genomic analysis

Virulence and antibiotic resistance gene annotation were conducted through the mass screening of contigs using ABRIcate.20 This analysis incorporated the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) and the Resfinder databases, with a selection criterion of 95% coverage and 80% alignment. Plasmid replicon detection utilized the PlasmidFinder21 applying the aforementioned coverage and alignment parameters. The protein secretion system profile for each isolate was investigated using TXSScan with MacSyFinder.22 Bacterial secretion systems were selected according to the fulfillment of mandatory genes for system assembly. Additionally, prophage prediction for S. enterica was executed using PHASTER, 23 with only intact detected prophages considered in the results. To assess genetic relatedness among isolates, a phylogenetic tree was generated based on a core alignment. Parsnp24 employed to create the core alignment, utilizing a random reference from one of the 72 analyzed genomes. For the development of a robust and supported phylogenetic tree, RAxML25 was utilized, employing a time-reversible GTR model with 100 bootstraps for statistical support. The resulted tree was midpoint rooted and subsequently edited using the Interactive Tree of Life iTOL.26

Results

A total of 18 S. enterica serovars were identified among the 72 farm animal isolates (Figure 1, panel A). The three most prevalent serovars were Oranienburg (25%), Give (15.2%), and Saintpaul (12.5%). Furthermore, a primary isolation source was found for each of the most prevalent serovars, such as Oranienburg in goat isolates, and Give and Saintpaul in cattle and poultry isolates, respectively (Figure 1, panel B). The serovars were categorized into 18 sequence types (ST) groups based on allelic profile (Figure 1, panel C). Notably, 94% of the serovars were successfully assigned to a specific ST, except for serovar Newport, designated into ST45 and ST118. STs were assigned for 92% (66 isolates) of the S. enterica genomes. The most frequently occurring STs were ST23 (n = 16), ST654 (n = 11), and ST50 (n = 8), corresponding to the prevalent serovars Oranienburg, Give, and Saintpaul, respectively. In terms of allelic differences, a range of 3 to 7 alleles was observed among detected STs with an average of 6 alleles.

Figure 1

Distribution of Salmonella serovars and isolates. A): Number of isolates from farm animals. B): Distribution of S. enterica serovars across farm animals. C): Spanning tree from the 18 STs detected. Black number inside the circles represents the ST while red numbers the allelic difference among STs. Outer colored ring represents ST proportion by isolation source

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4da9b909-2910-4130-a24e-6cae112f9d78/image/1408c570-a657-4dba-8e83-7d7889f13f87-uimage.png

Figure 2

S. enterica phylogenetic tree coupled with virulence presence/absence markers. Highlighted labels show serovar. An additional color column showed sample isolation source. Specific clades are colored according serovar. Bootstraps >85 are displayed with blue triangles

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4da9b909-2910-4130-a24e-6cae112f9d78/image/3d1309aa-33be-4667-999c-53d232fe60c4-u12.jpg

Figure 3

Accumulative graph. A): Graph for Salmonella enterica plasmids by serovar. B): Graph for Salmonella enterica phages by serovar. The serovars are shown on the Y axis, while the occurrence percentage is shown on the X axis. Each plasmid and phage are denotated with different color. Total number of plasmid or phage occurrence are shown in bar chart in green

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4da9b909-2910-4130-a24e-6cae112f9d78/image/4e5330cc-a9f1-4077-aef6-4bf613773ab1-u13.jpg

The genomic content linked to virulence markers has been delineated across two figures. Supplementary Figure 1 illustrates the conservative profile of genes detected across all isolates while Figure 2 highlights virulence markers specific to individual serovars. Within the shared genetic framework, genes for thin aggregative fimbriae responsible for biofilm formation (csgA-G), type 1 fimbria, Type III Secretion System (T3SS) encoded by SPI-1 and SPI-2, and the TSSS-1 secreted effectors were identified in all serovars originating from the three animal sources (Figure 1). On the other hand, the related E. coli adhesive fimbriae (faeC-E) were found exclusively for the serovars Anatum, Saintpaul, Minnesota, and Oranienburg. A distinct clade, comprising five different serovars, exhibited the presence of the long polar fimbriae (lpfA-E). Plasmid-encoded fimbriae (pefA-D) were identified in serovar Typhimurium. The immune modulation genes gtrA and gtrB were observed in the Luciana serovar. Interestingly, the sodCI gene, associated with environmental stress, was present in all members of serovars Saintpaul and Weltevreden. Finally, type VI secretion system components tssJ, L, and M were found in Weltevreden and Agona serovars.

Concerning antibiotic resistance, all 72 isolates demonstrated the presence of the aac(6´)-laa gene, indicative of aminoglycoside antibiotic inactivation. Specifically, the foasA7 gene associated with fosfomycin acid antibiotic resistance was found for the two S. Agona genomes. Additionally, floR and tet(A) genes were detected in the singular Montevideo genome, conferring resistance to phenicol and tetracycline, respectively.

A total of 58 replicon plasmids, categorized into 14 distinct types were identified among the isolates (Figure 3, panel A). Notably, the serovar Give exhibited the highest number (23/58) and diversity, encompassing 7 different replicons. The two most observed replicons were IncFII(Prsb107) and IncFII(S), with 20 and 16 occurrences, respectively, constituting 62% of the total observed replicons. The serovars Cayar, Albany, and Montevideo exhibited the lowest replicon number (1/58) and diversity (1/14).

A total of 183 prophage sequences were detected, encompassing 94% of the serovars (17/18). The highest occurrences were associated with serovars Give (46/183), Minnesota (32/183), and Oranienburg (31/183), securing the first, second, and third positions, respectively. The most frequently observed prophages across genomes were Vibrio X29 (21/183), Escher RCS47 (21/183), and Salmon Fels 1 (18/183). In contrast, Gaminara and Albany each exhibited only one prophage insertion. The least observed prophages were Entero DE3, Escher500465, Enteri Sf101, Escher 500465 1, and Entero Mu, each presenting only one sequence.

Discussions

The genomic diversity of S. enterica in farm animals from Sinaloa is composed of a broad range of 18 serovars associated with one ST. The detected serovars have been previously reported in Mexico by other investigations.7 Nevertheless, this is the first report for serovars Thompson and Soahanina in Mexico. Similar serovars have been reported in other studies around the world in farm animals causing diarrhea. 27, 28, 29 Although the three main serovars found in this study are uncommonly related to nontyphoidal salmonellosis, epidemiological outbreaks have been detected in Mexico and the rest of the world.30, 31, 32 Salmonella isolates were classified into 18 STs according to the MLST. This approach consists of a typing tool for isolate comparisons, such as outbreak identification and the recognition of virulent strains. 33 Under this scenario, STs found in Sinaloa have been detected in epidemiological outbreaks in other countries. For example, STs 19 and 26 belonging to S. serovars Typhimurium and Thompson respectively, have been detected in patients with clinical symptoms in the USA. 34 Moreover, epidemiologic studies for serovar Agona ST13 have been related to the French and German outbreaks. 35 The resulting STs for the prevalent serovars Oranienburg (ST23), Give (ST654), and Saintpaul (ST50) support the notion of their wide distribution and prevalence in Mexico. 36, 37

The mandatory genes for T3SS assembly were found for all 72 the examined isolates. These genes facilitate the translocation of protein effectors, leading to their internalization within host cells, thereby enabling intracellular persistence and replication. Conversely, certain isolates exhibited additional virulence markers that may confer a significant advantage in terms of survival and transmission during colonization process,38 particularly noteworthy in generalist serovars, as the predominant observed in this study. An illustrative instance is provided by the fimbria adhesive faeC-E identified in serovars, Oranienburg, Saintpaul, Minnesota, and Anatum. This fimbria notably enhances adherence to epithelial cells. Furthermore, the extensively characterized long polar fimbria may contribute to the binding of M-like cells on the intestinal Peyer patches.39 The found gtr operon is accountable for the structural modification of lipopolysaccharide, potentially augmenting immune invasion by evading surface antigens recognition by the host immune system.40 Notably, the stress adaptation sodCl gene may afford Salmonella protection against phagocytic superoxide during infection. 41 Additionally, it has been elucidated that sodCl plays a pivotal role in the adaptation role in Salmonella survival in non-host environments such river water.42

In contrast to findings reported in other studies,43, 44 our investigation revealed a notably low content of antibiotic resistance gene. A mere of the 95% of the examined genomes exhibited resistance to a single antibiotic, especially aminoglycoside. Conversely, the remaining 5% demonstrated multidrug resistance (MDR), encompassing resistance to tetracycline and phenicol. This discrepancy may be attributed to the fact that the animals analyzed in our study originate from small-scale farms primarily dedicated to self-consumption. Consequently, the utilization of antibiotics on these farms is relatively limited. This limited usage suggests that Salmonella strains in this context do not readily acquire antibiotic resistance, in stark contrast to animals intended for commercialization where the indiscriminatory use of antibiotics has been implicated as a contributing factor for antibiotic resistance development.41

The plasmid replicons IncFII(pRSB107) and IncFII(S) emerged as the most prevalent types among the Salmonella isolates, a consistent finding with observations in the United States45 and China.46 The presence of these replicons may signify a mechanism facilitating horizontal gene transfer within Salmonella genomes, potentially contributing to virulence enhancement. To exemplify, IncFII(pRSB107) has been reported to harbor an aerobactin virulence marker and may be associated with MDR.47 Additionally, the replicon Col(pHAD28) carries the qnrB19 gene, imparting quinolone resistance,48 while IncF(S) is linked to spv, contributing to Salmonella systemic virulence and intramacrophage survival.49 Prophage insertions constitute another pivotal evolutionary mechanism influencing bacterial differentiation and persistence. Notably, associations with immune protection have been established in relation to the prophage VibrioX29. This phenomenon, although infrequently observed in prior studies, was widely detected in our investigation. Furthermore, the identification of the prophages Gifsy-1, Gifsy-2, Fels-1, and Fels-2 in S. Typhimurium has been linked to an adaptative response to stress conditions.50 Notably, studies have established that the Gifsy prophage family may genetically contribute to the presence of the SopE gene, facilitating host entry through membrane folding induced by cytoskeleton rearrangement.

Conclusions

The microcosm population structure of Salmonella isolated from farm animals’ genomes in Sinaloa reveals 18 serovars, with S. Oranienburg, Give, and Saintpaul being the most prevalent. Genomic evidence related to ST outbreaks, the presence of virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance markers highlight a significant public health risk. Profiling these isolates genomically could provide invaluable association studies, aiding in tracking Salmonella sources and implementing timely containment measures. Replicons and prophages, acting as mechanism for horizontal gene transfer, may contribute to Salmonella adaptation by triggering stress responses and expanding its genomic repertoire for virulence. We advocate for an in-depth genomic characterization of replicons and prophages to enhance understanding of Salmonella genomic contribution to its adaptation and survival in various environments, given its ability to transition between environmental reservoirs and host. Such an approach would offer valuable insights into Salmonella broader ecological and adaptive potential, informing public health strategies and interventions effectively.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Foodborne Germs and Illnesses2023https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/foodborne-germs.html

2 

AK Bhunia Foodborne microbial pathogens: Mechanisms and pathogenesisSpringerNew York201827187

3 

S Sanchez CL Hofacre MD Lee JJ Maurer MP Doyle Animal sources of salmonellosis in humansJ Am Vet Med Assoc200222144927

4 

LR Nielsen YH Schukken YT Gröhn AK Ersbøll Salmonella Dublin infection in dairy cattle: risk factors for becoming a carrierPrev Vet Med2004651-24762

5 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Salmonella2020https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/index.html

7 

MB Contreras-Soto JA Medrano-Félix JR Ibarra-Rodríguez J Martínez-Urtaza J Martínez-Urtaza QC Chaidez Los últimos 50 años de Salmonella en México: Fuentes de aislamiento y factores que influyen en su prevalencia y diversidadRev Bio Cien2018626

8 

SK Demirbilek MT Mascellino Salmonellosis in AnimalsSalmonella - A Re-emerging PathogenIntechOpen201810.5772/intechopen.72192

9 

J Hur C Jawale JH Lee Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from food animals: A reviewFood Res Int201245281930

10 

SL Marcus JH Brumell CG Pfeifer BB Finlay Salmonella pathogenicity islands: big virulence in small packagesMicrobes Infect20002214556

11 

P Velge A Wiedemann M Rosselin N Abed Z Boumart AM Chaussé Multiplicity of Salmonella entry mechanisms, a new paradigm for Salmonella pathogenesisMicrobiologyopen20121324358

12 

MP Stevens TJ Humphrey DJ Maskell Molecular insights into farm animal and zoonotic salmonella infectionsPhilos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci15303641530270823

13 

14 

X Didelot R Bowden DJ Wilson Tea Peto DW Crook Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencingNat Rev Genet201213960112

15 

S Andrews FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data2010https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/

16 

AM Bolger M Lohse B Usadel Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence dataBioinformatics20143015211420

17 

D Coil G Jospin AE Darling A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq dataBioinformatics20153145879

18 

CE Yoshida P Kruczkiewicz CR Laing EJ Lingohr VPJ Gannon JHE Nash The Salmonella in silico typing resource (SISTR): an open web-accessible tool for rapidly typing and subtyping draft Salmonella genome assembliesPLoS One2016111e0147101

19 

AP Francisco C Vaz PT Monteiro J Melo-Cristino M Ramirez JA Carriço PHYLOViZ: phylogenetic inference and data visualization for sequence based typing methodsBMC Bioinformatics201213187

20 

T Seemann ABRicate: mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes201828The University of MelbourneMelbourne, Australiahttps://github.com/tseemann/abricateAccessed on 28 February 2019

21 

A Carattoli E Zankari A García-Fernández MV Larsen O Lund L Villa In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typingAntimicrob Agents Chemother20145873895903

22 

B Néron R Denise C Coluzzi M Touchon EPC Rocha SS Abby MacSyFinder v2: Improved modelling and search engine to identify molecular systems in genomesbioRxiv202210.1101/2022.09.02.506364

23 

D Arndt JR Grant A Marcu T Sajed A Pon Y Liang PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search toolNucleic Acids Res.201644W11621

24 

TJ Treangen BD Ondov S Koren AM Phillippy The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomesGenome Biol20141511524

25 

A Stamatakis RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogeniesBioinformatics201430913123

26 

I Letunic P Bork Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developmentsNucleic Acids Res201947W12569

27 

PRC Braga RM Basso LSA Martins MG Ribeiro AF Amarante MRT Casas Occurrence of Salmonella spp. in fecal samples from foals with and without diarrhea in the state of São Paulo: microbiological diagnosis, antimicrobial susceptibility profile, and molecular detectionPesq Vet Bras202343e7194

28 

B Zahra M Assia T Abdelaziz ALK Abia SY Essack Distribution and Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance of NTS Salmonella Isolated from Farm Animals and Animal Food Products in AfricaAntimicrobial Research and One Health in AfricaSpringerCham20235780

29 

C Wray A Wray Salmonella in domestic animalsCABI2000

30 

T Ooka Y Gotoh S Hatanaka M Yoshimori A Salmonella enterica Serovar Oranienburg Clone Caused a Cluster of Bacteremia Cases in Persons With No Recognizable Underlying Diseases in JapanOpen Forum Infect Dis2022101ofac695Oxford University Press US

31 

AJ Punchihewage-Don J Hawkins AM Adnan F Hashem S Parveen S Parveen The outbreaks and prevalence of antimicrobial resistant Salmonella in poultry in the United States: An overviewHeliyon2022811e11571

32 

A Dyda PY Nguyen AA Chughtai MC Raina Changing epidemiology of Salmonella outbreaks associated with cucumbers and other fruits and vegetablesGlob Biosecur20202113

33 

R Muñoz BDL Rivas JA Curiel CA Batt ML Tortorello IDENTIFICATION METHODS | Multilocus Sequence Typing of Food MicroorganismsEncyclopedia of Food Microbiology2nd EdAcademic PressOxford20143009

34 

MR Turcotte JT Smith J Li X Zhang KL Wolf F Gao Genome characteristics of clinical Salmonella enterica population from a state public health laboratory, New Hampshire, USA, 2017–2020BMC Genomics2017231537

35 

A Dangel A Berger U Messelhäußer R Konrad S Hörmansdorfer N Ackermann Genetic diversity and delineation of Salmonella Agona outbreak strains by next generation sequencingEuro Surveill199324181800303

36 

L Li RH Olsen J Xiao H Meng S Peng L Shi Genetic context of bla CTX-M-55 and qnrS1 genes in a foodborne Salmonella enterica serotype Saintpaul isolate from ChinaFront Microbiol202213899062

37 

A Gómez-Baltazar A Godínez-Oviedo G Vázquez-Marrufo MS Vázquez-Garcidueñas M Hernández-Iturriaga Genomic analysis of the MLST population structure and antimicrobial resistance genes associated with Salmonella enterica in MexicoGenome2023661231932

38 

T Rehman L Yin MB Latif J Chen K Wang Y Geng Adhesive mechanism of different Salmonella fimbrial adhesinsMicrob Pathog2019137103748

39 

G Gonzalez-Escobedo JM Marshall JS Gunn Chronic and acute infection of the gall bladder by Salmonella Typhi: understanding the carrier stateNat Rev Microbiol201191914

40 

MR Davies SE Broadbent SR Harris NR Thomson MWVD Woude Horizontally acquired glycosyltransferase operons drive salmonellae lipopolysaccharide diversityPLoS Genet201396e1003568

41 

B Tang M Elbediwi RB Nambiar H Yang J Lin M Yue Genomic characterization of antimicrobial-resistant salmonella enterica in duck, chicken, and pig farms and retail markets in Eastern ChinaMicrobiol Spectr2022105e0125722

42 

JR Aguirre-Sanchez JR Ibarra-Rodriguez I F Vega-Lopez J Martínez-Urtaza C Chaidez-Quiroz Genomic signatures of adaptation to natural settings in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica Serovars SaintpaulInfect Genet Evol202190104771

43 

RE Castro-Vargas MP Herrera-Sánchez R Rodríguez-Hernández IS Rondón-Barragán Antibiotic resistance in Salmonella spp. isolated from poultry: A global overviewVet World20201310207084

44 

X Zhao M Hu Q Zhang C Zhao Y Zhang L Li Characterization of integrons and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella from broilers in ShandongPoult Sci20209912704654

45 

EA Mcmillan SK Gupta LE Williams Antimicrobial resistance genes, cassettes, and plasmids present in Salmonella enterica associated with United States food animalsFront Microbiol201910832

46 

N Lyu Y Feng Y Pan H Huang Y Liu C Xue Genomic characterization of Salmonella enterica isolates from retail meat in BeijingFront Microbiol202112636332

47 

L Villa A García-Fernández D Fortini A Carattoli Replicon sequence typing of IncF plasmids carrying virulence and resistance determinantsJ Antimicrob Chemother20106512251829

48 

U Fiegen G Klein A Jong C Kehrenberg Detection of a novel qnrB19-carrying plasmid variant mediating decreased fluoroquinolone susceptibility in Salmonella enterica serovar HadarMicrob Drug Resist20172332804

49 

RD Chacón M Ramírez CL Rodríguez-Cueva C Sánchez WU Quispe-Rojas CS Astolfi-Ferreira Genomic Characterization and Genetic Profiles of Salmonella Gallinarum Strains Isolated from Layers with Fowl Typhoid in ColombiaGenes (Basel)2023144823

50 

JE Kurasz MC Crawford S Porwollik O Gregory KR Tadlock EC Balding Strain-Specific Gifsy-1 Prophage Genes Are Determinants for Expression of the RNA Repair Operon during the SOS Response in Salmonella enterica Serovar TyphimuriumJ Bacteriol20232051e0026222



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 05-04-2024

Accepted : 12-04-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/ 10.18231/j.ijmr.2024.003


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 739

PDF Downloaded: 262