Get Permission Farooqui, Hora, Vijay, and Naz: Aerobic bacterial profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern of chronic suppurative otitis media in tertiary care hospital


Introduction

Chronic suppurative otitis media is a chronic inflammation of the middle ear cleft characterises by persistent perforation of the tympanic membrane with intermittent or continuous purulent or mucopurulent discharge from the ear canal for more than 2 weeks to three months.1

The risk of infection is higher in malnourished people with poor living conditions and lack of hygiene. It isa prevalent infection in children and an important cause of preventable hearing loss.  It leads to hearing loss of more than 30 dB in half of patients without treatment. It leads to poor scholastic performance, and delayed speech and language development.2

The prevalence of CSOM in school-going children is 7% in India which is more than the rest of the world. If prevalence is more than 4%, it is a public health problem. In untreated patients, the infection can spread from the middle ear to involve other deep structures like the mastoid facial nerve lateral sinuses labyrinth and meninges.1, 3

The poor living conditions, lack of hygiene, limited access to medical facilities and recurrent upper respiratory infections are common predisposing factors for CSOM.4 WHO recommends a four-step initiative to prevent it known as HEAR—Hygiene of the ear, Early management of AOM, Antibiotics, and Raising awareness.5

Commonly reported micro-organisms in patients of CSOM are Pseudomonas, streptococcus, Staphylococcus Klebsiella Escherichia coli, proteus and anaerobic bacteria like bacteroid, peptostreptococcus and propionibacterium.6, 7

The aetiology of CSOM is poorly understood and causative organisms also vary according to the geographical area of studies so empirical treatment of CSOM also varies with a profile of microorganisms from CSOM of the local area is essential to establish empirical therapy in underdeveloped countries lack of hygiene poor socioeconomic condition lack of proper follow up of recurrent upper respiratory tract infection at CSOM people of having cleaning of the ear canal with ear bud match stick hair pin key wood stick nail etc.8, 9 Hence, it is mandatory to study antibiogram of each case of CSOM to formulate local antibiotic policy for appropriate use of antibiotics. This will certainly help in achieving a safe ear and controlling the organism’s developing resistance to prevalent antibiotics.

Materials and Methods

It is a descriptive cross-sectional study, conducted in the microbiology and ENT department of Jhalawar Medical College Jhalawar Rajasthan from May 2022 to April 2023.

Inclusion criteria include all the patients present in ENT OPD and clinically diagnosed CSOM with active purulent or mucopurulent discharge from the last 2 weeks and gave the consent for study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who prescribed antibiotic in last one month, Ear discharge within less than 2 weeks (acute cases), and patients of intact tympanic membrane plus discharge (case of otitis externa).

Methodology

The sample was collected from all the CSOM patients who attended ENT OPD in study duration and fulfilled inclusion criteria. Samples were collected after cleaning of ear with normal saline with proper aseptic measures. A sterile ear swab was used. With the help of aural speculum. After collection, the sample was put in transport media and sent to the bacteriology laboratory. Samples were collected before taking antibiotics and in the case of bilateral CSOM, samples were collected separately from both the ears.10

Collected samples were sub-cultured in Nutrient Agar media, Blood agar media and Mac Conkey Agar medium. All the samples that showed positive growth followed the antibiotic sensitivity test. Identification of bacteria is based on colony morphology, Microscopic examination and biochemical reactions. AST put on Muller Hinton agar by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method according to CLSI 2022 (clinical laboratory standard institute) guideline. The isolate was considered multidrug-resistant (MDR) when non-susceptible to at least one agent in more than three antimicrobial categories/groups.11

Data was analysed by using the Microsoft SPSS software version and for comparison chi-square testall clinical history names age gender unique identification numbers durations of symptoms were noted down in predetermined proforma.

Result  

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study. We collected 310 samples out of which 249 (80%) showed positive growth in aerobic bacterial culture. Age-wise distribution of participants (Table 1), distribution of isolates from CSOM samples (Table 2), susceptibility patterns of gram negative bacilli (Table 3) and Gram positive cocci (Table 4) are mentioned below.

Table 1

Age wise distribution of participants

Age group

%

1-15

171

68.6

16-30

37

14.8

31-45

8

3

46-60

3

1

>60

30

12

Total

249

In the present study, 59% of patients have kachcha ghar (made up of clay and brick) indicating low socioeconomic living conditions. Unilateral ear infections are present in 91% of cases. Pseudomonas was the most common bacteria isolated from patients.

Table 2

List of isolated bacteria 

Organism

Percentage

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

92

37%

Staphylococcus aureus

75

30%

Escherichia coli

35

14%

Proteus mirabilis

21

8.5%

Coagulase negative Staphylococcus Spp

7

2.8%

Klebsiella Spp

5

2%

Citrobacter Spp   

3

1.2%

Pneumococci

11

4.4%

Total

249

Table 3

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Gram-negative Bacilli

Pseudomonas 

E coli

Proteus

Ciprofloxacin

25(27%)

9(25%)

7 (33%)

Cephalexin 

-

9(25%)

-

Amoxycillin Clavulanic acid

-

17(48%)

14(66%)

Ceftriaxone 

-

15(42%)

7 (33%)

Ceftazidime 

56(61%)

28(80%)

14 (66%)

Gentamicin 

14(15%)

9(25%)

7 (33%)

Amikacin 

64(69%)

25 (71.4%)

19 (90.4%)

Piperacillin Tazobactam

71(77%)

30 (85%)

14 (66%)

Imipenem 

92(100%)

32 (91%)

19 (90.4%)

Table 4

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern for Gram-positive cocci

Ofloxacin

Erythromycin

Ciprofloxacin

Linezolid

Cotrimoxazole

MSSA 64

85%

34%

71%

96%

39%

MRSA 11

63%

36%

36%

81%

45%

[i] MSSA: Methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, MRSA: Methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus

In our study, patient ages range from 1 year to 75 years. Most patients were male. the maximum number of patients (69%) were from age group 1-15. Male were 51% and female were 49% there was no statistically significant difference between age and gender (p-value<0.05). The most common organism is Pseudomonas 37%, followed by Staphylococcus aureus 30% and Escherichia coli 14%.

Discussion

In a country like India, a large proportion of people are from below the poverty line and have limited access to health facilities. Poor hygiene and orthodox approach to treat CSOM with use of honey or oil- based concoctions leads to the proliferation of opportunistic bacteria and blockade of Eustachian tube.2

In our study, 59% of patients have kachhaghar which indicates they belong to a poor socioeconomic group. Isolation of coliform bacteria like Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella pneumoniae which are common faecal bacteria and water bacteria like Pseudomonas aeruginosa suggests possibility of people being at high risk of infection due to poor hygienic environment.2

In this study most of the patients were from the age group 1-15 years similar to Farooqui et al. & Sahu et al that reported, CSOM is most common in the first and second decades. There are some predisposing factors for the high prevalence of CSOM in children like small Eustachian tube with a more horizontal position and more flaccid cartilage and recurrent upper respiratory infection rate.2, 4, 12, 13

In the present study, 51% of patients are male similar to Basavaraj et al (55% male), and Abraham et alreported 54% male from Tanzania. While another study reported female patients were more than male patients (59%).8, 10

The difference of genders in the prevalence of CSOM is unclear some studies reported a high prevalence in females and some reported a high males, the reason for this might be related to the difference in propensity to seek medical attention between two genders and different geographical areas, rural/ urban site as CSOM has been reported equally prevalent in both gender.8, 10

In our study the most common isolate was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (37%), Similarly to Farooqui et al 41%, Sharma et al 50%, Raid M Al-ani et al 57% and Basavaraj et al  38%. however Abraham et al reported Klebsiella as the most common isolate in Tanzania Udden et al reported Proteus sp as the most common isolate.9, 13, 14, 15

The survival rate of pseudomonas is high among competition with other gram-negative bacilli due to minimum nutritional requirements relevant to high antibiotic resistance rate, ability to make biofilm, secretion of antibacterial substances like pyocyanin and bacteriocin that kill other bacteria, and even survive in many disinfectants.7

Pseudomonas has a pilli which has ability to attach to the diseased and dead epithelium of the middle ear in case of acute suppurative otitis media and can lead to CSOM. Pseudomonas is more sensitive to Amkacin, Piperacilline-tazobactam Imipenem as compared to Ceftazidime (61%) & ciprofloxacin (27%).14

Staphylococcus aureus is the second most common isolate recovered in patients of CSOM; it is similar to Prakash et al and Sharma et al. In the current study, Staphylococcus aureus showed susceptibility to linezolid (96%) and Ofloxacin (85%) and least sensitive to erythromycin. 13, 16

A systematic review by Colemen reported that Pseudomonas Spp and Staphylococcus aureus are the most prevalent microorganisms in CSOM the difference in various studies is due to different geographical locations it is difficult to have common empirical therapy to eradicate the infection therefore local continuous periodic surveillance is essential; step in management of CSOM.17, 18

In our study, Imipenem Piperacillin tazobactam and amikacin appear to be most effective against gram-negative bacilli isolated from ear discharge but unable to achieve effective concentrations of systemic antibiotic in the infected tissues of the middle ear.6, 19 GNBs are least susceptible to cefazolin, ceftriaxone. An investigator from Nigeria reported that Klebsiella pneumoniae as the commonest isolated bacteria from CSOM and most of the people were from low socioeconomic groups.20

Ciprofloxacin and gentamycin is a very commonly used economical topical preparation although resistance is common against them among common gram negative bacteria and Staphylococcus Spp. Recent studies show emerging resistance to ciprofloxacin Deb et al reported 50% resistance to ciprofloxacin while Sharma et al reported high susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and erythromycin.13, 17

Ciprofloxacin was the most prescribed topical agent showing an increase in resistance to common organisms of CSOM. Hence it is mandatory to study the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of each case of CSOM to formulate local antibiotic policy. This will help in achieving a ‘Safe ear’ and also control the developing resistance to common antibiotics.20

Limitation

This is a cross-sectional study so difficult to determine the duration of the disease and the beginning of the disease at the actual age of infection. The middle ear aspiration suction technique is a more sensitive method to collect the sample. But it is an invasive procedure, has its side effects and less convenient to the patients as compare to Ear swab.

Conclusion

When we analyse result of present study and other studies it is clear that the microbiological profile and AST pattern has been changing with due courses of time. Pseudomonas Spp. followed by Staphylococcus Spp were the two common causative organisms of CSOM. Based on this study, suggestions for empirical antibiotics are Amikacin for gram negative bacilli and ofloxacin for Staphylococcus Spp. The result of this study should be undertaken to formulate local antibiotic policy and to determine bacteriological profile. This will help to achieve Safe Ear and reduce the the incidence of drug incidence.

Ethical

This study was conducted after taking ethical clearance from the institutional committee IECJMC 16 dated 19/10/22.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

World Health Organization Chronic suppurative otitis media : burden of illness and management options2004World Health Organizationhttps://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42941

2 

R Prakash D Juyal V Negi S Pal S Adekhandi M Sharma Microbiology of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media in a Tertiary Care Setup of Uttarakhand State, IndiaN Am J Med Sci2013542827

3 

JR Saraswati R Venkatesh M Jeya Study of aerobic bacterial and fungal aetiology of chronic suppurative otitis media in tertiary care hospital in outskirts of Chennai, IndiaInt J Health Sci Res20131199201

4 

MK Farooqui P Vohra R Naz A Goel A Hussain S Khan Bacterial Aetiology and their Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Otitis Media in Paediatric Age GroupInt J Curr Microbiol App Sci20165838793

5 

DW Teele JO Klein C Chase P Menyuk BA Rossner The Greater Boston Otitis Media Study Group Otitis media in infancy and intellectual ability, school achievement, speech and language at age 7 yearsJ Infect Dis1990162365894

6 

R Mittal CV Lisi R Gerring J Mittal K Mathee G Narasimhan Current concepts in the pathogenesis and treatment of chronic suppurative otitis mediaJ Med Microbiol20156410110316

7 

RG Jensen HK Johansen T Bjarnsholt SR Eickhardtsørensen P Homøe Recurrent otorrhea in chronic suppurative otitis media: is biofilm the missing link?Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol2017274727417

8 

ZS Abraham D Ntunaguzi AA Kahinga KB Mapondella ER Massawe EJ Nkuwi Prevalence and etiological agents for chronic suppurative otitis media in a tertiary hospital in TanzaniaBMC Res Notes2019121429

9 

MK Farooqui R Naz A Kumar Yadav M A Arora AK Malik Sociodemographic profile and type of hearing loss in CSOM from a tertiary care hospital in a rural areaJ Evid Based Med Healthc2016325660

10 

B Hiremath RS Mudhol MA Vagrali Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Bacteriological Profile and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: A 1-Year Cr14oss-Sectional StudyIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg201971Suppl 212216

11 

CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement2022Clinical and Laboratory Standards InstituteWayne and Pennsylvania

12 

MC Sahu SK Swain Surveillance of antibiotic sensitivity pattern in chronic suppurative otitis media of an Indian teaching hospitalWorld J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg2019528894

13 

K Sharma A Aggarwal PMS Khurana Comparison of bacteriology in bilaterally discharging ears in chronic suppurative otitis mediaIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck2010621537

14 

RM Al-Ani MI Al-Zubaidi SA Lafi Profile of aerobic bacteria and their antibiotic sensitivity in chronic suppurative otitis media in Al-Ramadi Teaching Hospital, Ramadi City, IraqQatar Med J2021202113

15 

F Uddén M Filipe Å Reimer M Paul E Matuschek J Thegerström Aerobic bacteria associated with chronic suppurative otitis media in AngolaInfect Dis Poverty20187142

16 

M Prakash K Lakshmi S Anuradha GN Swathi Bacteriological profile and their antibiotic susceptibility pattern of cases of chronic suppurative otitis mediaAsian J Pharm Clin Res2013632102

17 

T Deb D Ray A study of the bacteriological profile of chronic suppurative otitis media in AgartalaIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg20126443269

18 

A Coleman A Wood S Bialasiewicz RS Ware RL Marsh A Cervin The unsolved problem of otitis media in indigenous populations: a systematic review of upper respiratory and middle ear microbiology in indigenous children with otitis mediaMicrobiome201861199

19 

S Vishwanath C Mukhopadhyay R Prakash S Pillai K Pujary P Pujary Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: Optimizing Initial Antibiotic Therapy in a Tertiary Care SetupIndian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg20126432859

20 

AA Bakari AA Adoga OA Afolabi AM Kodiya BM Ahmad Pattern of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media at the National Ear Care Centre Kaduna, NigeriaNiger J Med Trop2010121225



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 23-07-2024

Accepted : 31-08-2024


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2024.037


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 199

PDF Downloaded: 51



Medical Abbreviation List