Introduction
Coinage originated in the first millennium BC/BCE. Noteworthy early coins include the Lydian Lion coins, the Persian daric and siglos, the Chinese Tong Bei, and the Islamic dirham and gold dinar. Indian coins have played a crucial role in documenting the political and economic changes throughout history.1 Recent studies conducted in different parts of the world have revealed that currency, whether in the form of coins or paper notes, carries considerable levels of microbial contamination that can potentially cause disease.2 The bacteria detected on these currency coins have the potential to trigger a broad spectrum of health issues, ranging from food poisoning, skin infections, respiratory and gastrointestinal infection to life threatening diseases such as meningitis and septicaemia. The contamination of currencies can also be attributed to dust, soil, water, and the microorganisms present on the handlers. The common bacterial contaminants isolated from currency are Bacillus sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococci, Vibrio cholerae, Enterococcus spp. and members of the Enterobacteriaceae family.3 The circulation of money creates a widespread environment for microbes to thrive and spread across various settings. Inadequate hygiene practices among food vendors, such as using the same unwashed hands for handling cash and preparing food, can facilitate the transmission of harmful microorganisms, resulting in foodborne illnesses. Currency frequently carries a variety of microbes, and when food handlers neglect to wash their hands properly after dealing with money and before food preparation, these microbes can contaminate the food. Consuming such contaminated food can subsequently lead to the transmission of diseases to consumers.4
Materials and Methods
Study area and design
The research was carried out in different regions of Nagpur, Maharashtra, India where 12 different currency coins were collected from each of the years of 2015 to 2024. The samples were processed at the Microbiology Department, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur.
Sample collection
A total of 120 currency coins consisting of 24 coins of each of INR.1, INR.2, INR.5, INR.10, INR.20 were collected from doctors, laboratory technicians, fish sellers, bus conductors, students, hotels & petrol pumps. For aseptic sample collection, individuals were instructed to place the coins into a sterile polythene bag, which was then labelled appropriately. The researcher avoided direct hand contact with the coins at all times. The packet was securely sealed and promptly sent to the laboratory for analysis. Fresh currency coins were obtained from the bank as part of the quality control process.
Laboratory methods and procedures
The Microbiology laboratory served as the setting for all lab-based investigations.
Identification and isolation of microbes
A sterile cotton swab was immersed in sterile distilled water and then used to rub both sides of the currency coins. The swab was subsequently inoculated onto culture plates (Blood agar and MacConkey agar) for each coin. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 hours, after which they were examined for bacterial colonies. Pure isolated colonies were subsequently subjected to Gram staining and then biochemically identified using Coagulase, Catalase, Oxidase, Indole, Methyl Red, Citrate & Urease tests.
Results
From the duration of 2015 to 2024, a total number of 120 Indian currency coins, 12 from each year, were tested for bacterial contamination. Pathogenic organisms were present on 50.83% of the coins that were tested. A total of 120 isolates obtained from the collected coins resulted in the identification of 7 distinct types of bacterial species. Figure 1 describes the prevalence of isolated organisms in the currency coins. The isolated organisms in descending order of frequency were, Klebsiella spp. (13.33%), Escherichia coli (10%), Staphylococcus aureus (8.33%), Pseudomonas spp. (5.83%), Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (5%), Micrococci (4.17%) and Bacillus spp. (4.17%). The current study revealed that Klebsiella spp. to have the highest occurrence rate, suggesting that fecal contamination may be due to cross-contamination with raw products or inadequate personal hygiene. Table 1 illustrates the prevalence of pathogenic microorganisms found on Indian currency coins across various occupational groups mainly doctors, laboratory technicians, fish sellers, bus conductors, students, hotels & petrol pump workers. The results showed in Table 2 indicate towards the extent of microbial contamination to be maximum in INR 1 coins and minimum in INR 20 coins. Higher contamination in the coins of lesser value indicates their more frequent usage in regular monetary transactions. Table 3 depicts the year wise prevalence of bacterial contamination in the coins. The extent of contamination shows a sharp reduction from the year 2020 onwards, the possible reason being the safety measures undertaken during the COVID pandemic and the increase in online monetary transactions thereafter.
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
The resistance patterns of all pathogenic Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive organisms are summarized in Table 4. 40% of the isolated Staphylococcus aureus strains were identified as MRSA. 83.33% of the E. coli strains demonstrated sensitivity to Ampicillin. Both E. coli and Klebsiella isolates demonstrated significant sensitivity to Amikacin, Gentamicin, and Ciprofloxacin. Pseudomonas showed good sensitivity to Amikacin, Gentamicin, Ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins.
Discussion
This study indicates that currency coins could harbor enteric pathogens. This dates back a long time and highlights the inadequate sanitary conditions and the poor personal hygiene practices prevalent among many occupational groups.5 Goktas and Oktay (1992) discovered findings that aligns with the results of the current study. They identified the following microorganisms from samples of 120 currency notes: aerobic spore-forming bacilli (91%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (63.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (4.2%), Enterococcus (24.1%), alpha-hemolytic Streptococcus (4.1%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (1.7%), Corynebacterium (7.5%), Lactobacilli (10.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (31.7%), Enterobacter (19.2%), Escherichia coli (17.5%), Proteus (1.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (0.8%), and Shigella flexneri (0.8%).6
The present study found that Klebsiella pneumoniae had the highest occurrence rate at 13.33%. This finding highlights the concerning unhygienic practices prevalent in open-air markets, where the constant handling of contaminated currency may expose individuals to the risk of ingesting enteropathogens.7 10% of the isolated organisms were E. coli, consistent with findings from previous studies.8, 9 The remaining isolates identified in this investigation were Staphylococcus aureus (8.33%), Pseudomonas species (5.83%), Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus (5%), Micrococci (4.17%), and Bacillus species (4.17%), which is a lower percentage compared to earlier studies.3, 10
The present study also highlights a significant decrease in bacterial contamination on Indian currency coins during the COVID and post-COVID years, owing to the good hand hygiene and sanitary practices and increase in the online monetary transactions resulting in less manual handling of currencies.
The currency coins are in general contaminated with potential pathogens, especially enteric pathogens. These pathogens can lead to a range of systemic effects, including urinary tract infections, community-acquired pneumonia, sepsis, recurrent meningitis, fatal acute bacterial myocarditis, toxic shock syndrome, skin infections, respiratory tract infections, and wound infections.11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Conclusion
In summary, the more people who handle money, the greater the chance that it could spread illnesses. This rapid circulation of money between people and surfaces facilitates the spread of illnesses. The current study determined that Indian currency coins frequently harbor disease-causing bacteria, which can contribute to the spread of numerous health problems. The advocation of greater sanitary care during handling of coins is definitely encouraged. It should be brought to the general knowledge of common people the importance of practicing good personal hygiene. Maintaining proper hand hygiene and following good sanitary practices will significantly lower the risk of infection, particularly for individuals who handle both food and money at the same time.