- Visibility 239 Views
- Downloads 67 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijmr.2021.027
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Bacteriological profile of pyoderma and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern in a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka
- Author Details:
-
Sunilkumar Biradar
-
Amaresh Nigudgi
-
Chandrashekar Kadaganchi
-
Praveen Kumar Doddamani *
Abstract
Introduction: Pyoderma is one of the common skin condition seen in dermatological OPD. Pyoderma are purulent infections of skin and its appendages mainly caused by various bacteria. Pyoderma could be primary or secondary to other conditions such as impetigo, carbuncle, folliculitis & others.
Materials and Methods: Two sterile swabs collected from the lesions each for Gram staining and culture. Culture done on sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar & incubated at 37oC. Identification done by colony morphology, repeat gram staining & biochemical tests. Antibiotic sensitivity testing of Isolates done by Kirby bauer disc diffusion testing following CLSI guidelines.
Results & Discussion: Of 315 cases diagnosed clinically as Pyoderma only 295 were culture positive. 59% of cases were primary type and impetigo was the most common type. Males were affected more than females in ratio 1.56:1. Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the most common cause of Pyoderma followed by CoNS and streptococcus pyogenes in gram positive bacteria. In gram negative bacteria E.coli is most common followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, pseudomonas auroginosa & citrobacter species. The major associated risk factors for causation of Pyoderma were found to be Malnutrition (35%) followed by Diabetes (16.5%), Hypertension (6.3%) & multiple comorbidities found in 12.6% of cases. However in 94 cases (30%) no associated factors detected.
Conclusion: Pyoderma mainly affects males than females with 10-30yrs being the most common age group affected. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common causative agent. Antibiotic sensitivity testing is mandatory to treat effectively & control drug resistance.
Introduction
The most common skin condition seen in dermatological OPDs is Pyoderma. Pyoderma are purulent infections of skin and its appendages mainly caused by pyogenic bacteria such as staphylococcus aureus, streptococcus species, CoNS, Enterococus, and gram negative bacteria such as E.coli, Klebsiella and pseudomonas.[1]
Primary pyoderma is involvement of normal skin and its infection by pyogenic bacteria directly affecting the normal tissue, whereas secondary pyoderma is involvement of skin with a condition predispoding to infection. Primary pyoderma is of various types such as impetigo, carbuncle, furuncle, folliculitis, cellulitis, and other purulent conditions of skin.[1], [2]
Malnutrition, poor hygiene, overcrowding, poor socioeconomic status, obesity, immunosuppressive conditions such as diabetes mellitus, malignancies, may increase the risk for pyoderma infection in developing countries.[2], [3]
With emergence of drug resistant bacteria and changing in antibiotic sensitivity pattern it has become a challenge to the clinician to treat pyoderma without proper microbiological reports. The rampant use of antibiotics both topical and systemic and lack of proper antibiotic policies at hospital level lead to the development of drug resistance globally.[4], [5]
Present study was conducted to know the bacteriological profile of pyoderma in this region and to determine its antibiotic sensitivity pattern along with special reference to MRSA.
Materials and Methods[6], [7]
A Retrospective study was conducted for a period of one year starting from June 2018 to May 2019 in a tertiary care hospital attached to MR Medical College, Kalaburagi in North Karnataka. Present study was conducted by Dept of Microbiology and Skin and VD dept Of MR medical college. Total samples collected were from 315 clinically diagnosed cases of pyoderma.
Inclusion criteria
All the patients attending the Skin and VD OPD with complaints of purulent skin infection were enrolled in the study after taking written consent from patient or attenders if the patient is minor.
Exclusion criteria
All the patients with non purulent skin lesion, insect bite, patients already on antibiotic therapy.
Specimen collection
Two sterile swabs were collected from clinically diagnosed case after cleaning the area with normal saline. In case of purulent lesions intact, pus was collected on the two sterile swabs after pricking the purulent lesion with sterile needle. The swabs were transported to the microbiology laboratory immediately within 15-30min.
One of the swabs was used for direct grams stain and other swab for inoculation on sheep blood agar and MacConkey agar, both plates incubated at 370c for 24-28hrs. The colony morphology was studied and was subjected to battery of biochemical tests based on repeat gram staining for identification to species level.
Antibiotic sensitivity testing of isolates was done by modified Kirby Bauer’s disc diffusion testing using 0.5 McFarland’s standard as per CLSI guidelines. HiMedia antibiotic discs used for gram positive cocci included, Penicillin(10units), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30µg),ciprofloxacin (5 µg), cefazolin(30 µg), cefuroxime(30 µg),erythromycin (15 µg), co-trimoxazole (25 µg), tetracycline(30 µg), and vancomycin (30 µg), clindamycin (2 µg) and the antibiotics discs used for gram negative bacilli included Ampicillin (10 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), piperacillin(100 µg), ceftazidime(30µg), ceftazidime + clavulanic acid(30 + 10 µg), piperacillin+ tazobactam (100+10 µg), co-trimoxazole (1.25+23.75 µg),tetracycline(30 µg), imipenem (10 µg). MRSA was detected using Cefoxitin disc method.
Results
Total of 315 cases diagnosed as pyoderma clinically were included in the study. Of 315 cases, 295 were culture positive and 20 culture negatives. ([Table 1])
Total number of clinically diagnosed cases pyoderma |
Culture positive |
Culture negative |
315 |
295 |
20 |
Around 59% of pyoderma cases were primary and 41% cases were secondary to contact dermatitis, scabies, skin ulcers & eczema.
Impetigo found to be the most common type followed by furunculosis, folliculitis, ecthyma and carbuncle.
Primary pyoderma |
Numbers of cases |
Secondary pyoderma |
Number of cases |
Impetigo |
48 |
Contact dermatitis |
39 |
Furunculosis |
43 |
Scabies |
35 |
Folliculitis |
39 |
Skin ulcers |
30 |
Ecthyma |
31 |
Eczema |
21 |
Carbuncle |
9 |
Dermatophytic infection |
4 |
Cellulitis |
4 |
|
|
Abscess |
8 |
||
Acute paronychia |
4 |
||
Total |
186(59.05%) |
|
129(40.95%) |
Total cases |
Male |
Female |
315 |
192(60.96%) |
123(39.04%) |
The incidence of pyoderma in Males is higher than females with ratio of 1.56:1.
Pyoderma is found all age groups mainly affecting 11-30 yrs age group constituting 45% of cases.
Age group |
Numbers of cases |
Percentage (%) |
Less than 10yrs |
35 |
11.1 |
11-20yrs |
76 |
24.1 |
21-30yrs |
66 |
20.9 |
31-40yes |
53 |
16.8 |
41-50yrs |
45 |
14.2 |
51-60yrs |
21 |
6.6 |
61-70yrs |
14 |
4.4 |
Above 70yrs |
5 |
1.5 |
Total |
315 |
|
The major associated risk factors for causation of Pyoderma was Malnutrition (35%) followed by Diabetes (16.5%), Hypertension (6.3%) & multiple comorbidities found in 12.6% of cases. However, in 94 cases (30%) no associated risk factors were detected.
Co morbidities |
Number of cases |
Percentage |
1. Malnutrition |
109 |
34.6% |
2. Diabetes |
52 |
16.5% |
3. Hypertension |
20 |
6.3% |
4. Multiple co morbidities |
40 |
12.6% |
5. None |
94 |
29.8% |
Total |
315 |
|
Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the most common cause of Pyoderma followed by CoNS and streptococcus pyogenes in gram positive bacteria.
In gram negative bacteria E. Coli is most common followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae, pseudomonas aeruginosa & citrobacter species.
Type of organism isolated |
Number of isolates |
Percentage |
1. Staphylococcus aureus |
195 |
66.10% |
2. CoNS |
36 |
12.20% |
3. Streptococcus pyogenes |
30 |
10.16% |
4. Escherichia coli |
14 |
4.74% |
5. Klebsiellapneumoniae |
9 |
3.05% |
6. Pseudomonas aeruginosa |
8 |
2.71% |
7. Citrobacterspecies |
3 |
1.01% |
Total |
295 |
100% |
Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of staphylococcus aureus was analysed to find the Penicillin G as the least resistant and Linezolid & Vancomycin as completely sensitive for all isolates.
Antibiotics |
Number of isolates sensitive |
Percentage |
1. Penicillin G |
24 |
12.30% |
2. Gentamicin |
141 |
87.69% |
3. Amikacin |
156 |
80.0% |
4. Erythromycin |
99 |
50.7% |
5. Ciprofloxacin |
97 |
49.7% |
6. Clindamycin |
136 |
69.7% |
7. Doxycycline |
175 |
89.7% |
8. Cotrimoxazole |
107 |
54.8% |
9. Linezolid |
195 |
100% |
10. Vancomycin |
195 |
100% |
Out of 195 Staphylococcus aureus isolated 23(11.7%) were Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) by cefoxitin disc method.
Discussion
Present study was conducted for period of one year at hospital attached to MR Medical college, Kalaburagi in north Karnataka to study the bacteriological profile of pyoderma with its antibiogram.
Out of total 315 cases of pyoderma, Primary Pyoderma cases were 186(59%) and secondary pyoderma cases were 129(41%) which was in accordance with the study conducted by Shanker Venkatesh BM et al.[8] and Paudel et al.[9] North Karnataka being a region with extremes of temperature, low socioeconomic status and overcrowded places may be reason for more secondary infections causing secondary pyoderma.
According to our study there was male preponderance with 60.96% compared to females with 39.04% and with Male to female ratio 1.56:1 which was in accordance with the study done by Shanker Venkatesh BM et al.[8] Ghadage DP et al,[10] Paudel et al.[9] This could be due to comparatively more exposure and outdoor physical activities in males compared to females.
The most common age group seen in this study was 11 to 20yrs and 21 to 30 years which is in line with other studies such as Hulmani M et al.,[11] Ashokan C et al.,[12] Ruturaj M K et al,[13] and Nipa Singh et al.[11]
Co-morbidities in the present study were found in 221 cases, Malnutrition being most common followed by diabetes which was comparable with study done by Singh A et al[14] and Nipa Singh et al.[11] Hypertension was found in 20 cases only, but may not be associated directly in causing the pyoderma.
Of 315 cases, 295 cases showed growth of bacteria and 20 cases were culture negative. The negative cultures may be attributed to the factors such as inadequate sample or patient may be on antibiotics in near past and unable to recall the history which was also seen in study conducted by Shanker Venkatesh BM et al.[8] Overall culture found be positive in 94% of cases making it necessary for all cases of pyoderma.
The most common organism isolated was Staphylococcus aureus 195(66.10%), followed by CoNS 36(12.20%), Streptococcus pyogenes 30(10.16%), Escherichia Coli14(4.74%), Klebsiella pneumoniae 09(3.05%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa 8(2.71%), Citrobacter species 3(1.01%). This finding was in line with studies done by Badabagni P et al,[15] Haibati S et al,[16] and Nipa Singh et al.[11] Gram positive bacteria were etiologic agent in 90% of pyoderma cases.
The antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin and linezolid being 100% sensitive was in accordance with studies such as Ashulmani M et al.,[17] Ashokan C et al.,[12] Ruturaj M K et al.,[13] and Nipa Singh et al.[11] Doxycycline and gentamicin sensitivity was found to be more when compared to other studies Singh A et al.[14] but in line with Haibati S, [16] Nipa Singh et al. [11] Overall most isolates of S.aureus were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, gentamicin, doxycycline and least sensitive to penicillin G.
Out of 195 Staphylococcus aureus isolated 23(11.7%) were MRSA by cefoxitin disc method which was slightly more than Malhotra SK et al.,[18] and Nipa Singh et al.[11] and not comparable and differs from study done by Jayaraj YM et al.[19] with 38.9%.
Conclusion
Pyoderma is an important public health issue and commonly seen in age group of 11-30 years with male preponderance. Staphylococcus aureus is most common organism causing pyoderma. Impetigo was found to be the most commom type followed by furunculosis, folliculitis & ecthyma. Emergence of drug resistant strain such as MRSA is an alarming sign for the community, which in turn demands for strict antibiotics policies which can reduce the incidence of drug resistant organisms in this region.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- Rani S, Jayalekha B, Sreekumary P. Bacteriological profile of pyoderma in a tertiary care centre in Kerala, India. Int J Res Dermatol. 2016;2(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Gandhi S, Ojha A, Ranjan K, Neelima. Clinical and Bacteriological Aspects of Pyoderma. N Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(10):492-5. [Google Scholar]
- Khare A, Mittal A, Kuldeep C, Balai M, Singh A, Gupta L. A clinico-bacteriological study of pyodermas at a tertiary health center in southwest Rajasthan. Indian J Dermatol. 2015;60(5):479-84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Llor C, Bjerrum L. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2014;5(6):229-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Craft N, Lee P, Zipoli M, Weinberg A, Swartz M, Johnson R, et al. Superficial cutaneous infections and pyodermas. Fitzpatrick`s Dermatology in General Medicine. 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Collee J, Marr W, Collee J, Fraser A, Marmion B. Tests for the identification of bacteria. Mackie and McCartney. Practical Medical Microbiology. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- . . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Shankervenkatesh B, Nagaraju K, Vivekananda N. Bacteriological Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Pyodermas at a Tribal Tertiary Care Hospital. Sch J App Med Sci. 2016;4(8E):3087-91. [Google Scholar]
- Paudel U, Parajuli S, Pokhrel D. Clinico-bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity pattern in pyodermas: A Hospital Based Study. Nepal J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;11(1):49-58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ghadage D, Salil Y. Bacteriological study of pyoderma with special reference to antibiotic susceptibility to newer antibiotics. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 1999;65(4):177-81. [Google Scholar]
- Singh N, Pradhan S, Sahoo T, Mohapatra I, Jena J, Pattnaik D. Bacteriological Profile of Pyoderma Cases Attending the Dermatology Department in a Tertiary Care Hospital. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(12):19-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ashokan C, Santosh K, Rao A. Clinico, bacteriological study of pyodermas at a tertiary care hospital, Andhra Pradesh: one year study. Int J Res Dermatol. 2017;3(3):374-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Ruturaj M, Surpam R, Saileela K, Manderwad G, Kumar H. Bacteriological profile of pyoderma in children. Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2019;5(1):4-8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Singh A, Singh K, Kanodia S, Singh S, Singh J, Mohammad A. Bacteriological study and antibiotic sensitivity patterns in cases of pyoderma. Int Med J. 2014;1(8):357-63. [Google Scholar]
- Badabagni P, Malkud S. Clinicoetiological study of pyodermas in a tertiary care hospital. Ind J Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016;2(2):53-7. [Google Scholar]
- Haibati S, Deshmukh A. Clinicobacteriological study of primary pyoderma with reference to antibiotic sensitivity. Int Med J. 2015;2(11):819-21. [Google Scholar]
- Hulmani M, Meti P, Kumar J. Bacteriological and antibiotic susceptibility study of pyodermas at a tertiary care center in central Karnataka. Int J Res Dermatol. 2017;3(1):145-50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Malhotra S, Malhotra S, Dhaliwal G, Thakur A. Bacteriological study of pyodermas in a tertiary care dermatological center. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(5):358-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Jayaraj Y, Kulkarni V, Shivannavar C, Arali S, Ravi M. Clinico-bacteriological studies on pyoderma in Gulbarga region (Karnataka state) emphases to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2014;5(1):616-24. [Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Biradar S, Nigudgi A, Kadaganchi C, Doddamani PK. Bacteriological profile of pyoderma and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern in a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka [Internet]. Indian J Microbiol Res. 2021 [cited 2025 Oct 14];8(2):135-138. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2021.027
APA
Biradar, S., Nigudgi, A., Kadaganchi, C., Doddamani, P. K. (2021). Bacteriological profile of pyoderma and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern in a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka. Indian J Microbiol Res, 8(2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2021.027
MLA
Biradar, Sunilkumar, Nigudgi, Amaresh, Kadaganchi, Chandrashekar, Doddamani, Praveen Kumar. "Bacteriological profile of pyoderma and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern in a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka." Indian J Microbiol Res, vol. 8, no. 2, 2021, pp. 135-138. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2021.027
Chicago
Biradar, S., Nigudgi, A., Kadaganchi, C., Doddamani, P. K.. "Bacteriological profile of pyoderma and its antibiotic sensitivity pattern in a tertiary care hospital in North Karnataka." Indian J Microbiol Res 8, no. 2 (2021): 135-138. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2021.027