- Visibility 19 Views
- Downloads 2 Downloads
- DOI 10.18231/j.ijmr.2020.022
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon polluted soil
- Author Details:
-
Ehenenden Iyobosa
-
Meng Xianagang *
-
Ning Hai Jun
-
Shu Fang
-
Wang Zhennan
Introduction
Petroleum hydrocarbon carbon contamination with environment has been a big threat to human and his natural surroundings.[1] The media that is affected by these pollutants are soil, water and air.[2] It brings change in the environment that resulted in way of introducing harmful effects that altered the quality of human life, animals, plants and microorganisms.[3] To reduce the harms caused by pollution, the three media mention above need to be subjected to physical, chemical, mechanical or biological treatment.[4] Generally in china, according to[5], [6] more than 8% of china's arable land is severely polluted. This was reaffirmed by[7] saying that one fifth area of China’s arable land is polluted, and the polluted arable land equal the size of Taiwan to a degree that farming should be prohibited there in totality. The United States Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) most targeted sites of hazardous wastes clean-up programs are made of 600 of 1408 different kinds of hydrocarbons.[8], [9], [10] Soil pollution is considered to be a lifethreatening problem because all the plant consumed by human and the animal is cultivated from the soil, therefore, proper attention most paid to soil pollution to reduce it to the barest minimal if not totally eliminated. Although soil remediation is of a high capital and labour intensive project, but due to man poise for cheaper method for a polluted soil remediation, much have been done using microorganisms to bioremediate contaminated soil which proved positive. This method termed to be labour and capital cheap and environmentally friendly.[11] However, not all bacteria have the adaptability to degrade pollutants like petroleum hydrocarbon especially in the soil, according to[12] it has been proven that microorganism’s capability and adaptability to degrade pollutants, depend on the individual strains ability to produce suitable biosurfactans and the formation of biodegrading association that is very strong and reliable throughout the degradation period. Also, it depend on the adaptability of the microorganism to carry out its physiological functions under natural condition that is characterized with limited water supply, low availability of nutrients and adverse pH condition.
Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil
The present of crude oil in the soil usually by spilling altered its properties. Therefore,[7], [13] define crude oil pollution as the contamination of the environment by crude oil. The products of crude oil (Hydrocarbons, solvents, etc.) used as a source of energy in the oil industry have polluted about 80% of lands. There exist hundreds different combination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHS), however, 28 compounds was identified to be hazardous by US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) in 2008.[14] Crude oil is made up saturated and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon, monocyclic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon;[15] these components are pollutants that contaminates the soil but aromatic hydrocarbon are the most highly hydrophobic which rendered them difficult to degrade.[16] Low molecular weight PAHs (LMW) and high molecular weight PAHs (HMW) are the classes of PAHs. naphthalene, fluorene, phenanthrene and anthracene with two to three (2-3) aromatic rings are LMW PAHs which are less toxic, while HMW PAHs of 4-7 aromatic rings (chrysene, Triphenylene, Pyrene, pentacene, Corannulene, and coronenes) are highly toxic, carcinogenic to human health and difficult to degrade[17], [18] Petroleum hydrocarbon pollution in the soil reduces the level of environmental biomass, taxas and the biodiversity. The presence of hydrocarbon in the soil can alter both the physical and chemical properties of the soil, especially the C/N ratio and soluble salt content.[7] According to research done by,[19] the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil have significant effects on the soil properties, it was noticed in observable differences in data obtained when comparing crude oil-polluted soil and non-polluted soil. Hydrocarbon polluted soils were slightly acidic whereas the control soils set towards neutrality. Crude oil reduced water infiltration into the soil and also causes low permeability. Hydrocarbon pollution increase soil organic content, it reduces the concentration of nitrogen, phosphorus and calcium in the soil.[19], [20] And an increase in hydrocarbon level in the soil caused low fertility of the soil, which negatively affect the agricultural productivity which reduces the source of livelihood of both human and animals in that geographical area.[1]
Soil bioremediation and its Mechanism
Bioremediation activities were first noticed among Romans around 600BC, where they used bioremediation to clean their wastewater, though their method was not as developed as today's biotechnological methods. Bioremediation was officially invented by George Robinson when he used microbes to degrade an oil spill on the coast of Santa Barbara;
California in the late 1960s.[21] Ever since this successful attempt, human has indulged on this natural method to treat contaminated environments. Bioremediation is the process of elimination or reduction of pollutants from the environment. It is an environmental or aesthetics waste detoxification mechanism with the help of microorganisms, plants, or their enzymes. However, when the waste detoxification is done at the contaminated site, it is referred to as In-situ Bioremediation. Contrarily, when the detoxification of waste is done outside the original site of the contamination is called Ex-situ Bioremediation.[22] This process involves relocating the contaminants from the contamination site before treatment is administered in a controlled environment. Also, bioremediation can be in a form of bioattenuation which solely depend of natural process of degradation, biostimulation where indigenous microorganisms are stimulated by addition of nutrients, water, and electron acceptors or electron donors to the soil, and bioaugmentation where microorganisms of high degradation ability are inoculated to the soil to enhance bioremediation.[23] Every bioremediation technology depends on many factors which include; the types, amount, and toxicity of a pollutant chemical species present in the soil site conditions and microbial activity (indigenous or exogenous strains).[24] Bacteria remediation can be anaerobic; in the absence of oxygen as an electron acceptor, bacteria can use organic chemicals or inorganic anions as alternative electrons acceptors. The bacteria involves in this bioremediation do not employ the utilization of oxygen during their metabolic pathway. And bacteria can also be aerobic; the bacteria involve employing oxygen to carry out effective biodegradation of pollutants in the soil. In general, oxygen acts as an electron acceptor by accepting the electrons from oxidizing organic substances (reduction) the organic substance oxidized loses electrons to oxygen (oxidation). For this study, aerobic bioremediation is explained in detail. Mineral oil contents and halogenated products of petrol chemicals are the most important classes of organic pollutants in the soil; therefore, the enzymatic- metabolic activities of aerobic bacteria specifically pertinence for the speedily and complete biodegradation of such organic compound and their various products. The optimal degrading potential of aerobic microorganisms can only be attained if the organic pollutant is accessible to the biodegrading microorganisms.[25] When bacteria pick up organic pollutants as illustrated in [Figure 1], the first intracellular remediation approach is enzymatic (oxygenases and peroxidases) oxidative process, cell biomass synthesis particularly from the metabolites in the center precursor, e.g., acetyl-CoA, succinate, pyruvate, and Sugars. These are required for various biosynthesis and growth. They are synthesized by gluconeogenesis and finally, the organic pollutants are converted into intermediates of the intermediary metabolism by the surrounding degradation pathways, e.g., the tricarboxylic acid cycle.[26]

Influencer factors of biodegradation of Petroleum hydrocarbon
Temperature
A slight increase in temperature of the soil tends to increase the bioremediation rate while decrease temperature reduces the rate of bioremediation.[28] There was a significant reduction in the level of total PAH and phenol with an increase in temperature of inoculated treatment in mesocosm studied. There was observable increased in desorption and bioavailability with an increase in temperature.[29] This could also be a result of the effect of temperature on microbial enzymatic makeup.
Nutrients
Nutrients play a major role in bioremediation; microbes need a commensurate amount of nutrients to carry out their metabolic activities, cell division, and growth. Trace elements that will serve as electron donor and electron acceptor are added into the soil in a form of organic (compost) and inorganic (fertilizer) this not only stimulates but also accelerate bioremediation.[30] Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons polluted soils can be enhanced with appropriate selection, combination and application of suitable nutrient to mesocosm.[31]
Bioavailability of Contaminant:
Availability of contaminant has a significant effect on the metabolic component of a cell, this can be view in three contaminant’s availability concentration levels, firstly, at the absent of contaminants, biodegradation will not occur because there will be insufficient energy supply to induce bioremediation. Secondly, at a low contaminant concentration level, bioremediation will occur but at a slow rate, this is a result of no spontaneous increase in the microbial population because there is no availability of energy required for cell division, therefore, the cell will maintain a resting stage. Finally, if there is enough bioavailable contaminant, energy supply will increase thereby inducing biodegrading, at this time it will be in a growing stage, due to cell division and an increase in growth rate.[32]
Moisture content
Optimum microbial growth can only occur in the presence of water, soil water content regulates oxygen diffusion. From a research work, it was found out that keeping the moisture content of the soil at an optimum value is critically important for a successful bioremediation process. It was also stated by an author that modification of water content of sandy clay soil to 60% of its field capacity, and moisture adjustment is a proper strategy to degrade the contaminated soil.[33], [28]
Electron donor, Oxygen content and Redox Potential:
The potential inhibitory effect of molecular oxygen is negated by excess addition of electron donor. Degradation is inversely proportional to redox potential, increase in oxidation of redox conditions, will result is decrease is bacterial perchlorate degradation. Electron acceptors such as sulfate, manganese oxides and iron oxides have significant effects on redox potential.[34]
PH
Soil pH alteration by liming process can be of a great important in PAH degradation, as some hydrocarbon feeding bacteria attained maximum potential for degradation in certain level of pH range.[35] However, in the presence hydrocarbonoclastes 2% Crude, changes in pH have no significant effect on the growth of bacterial strains.[36]
Bioaugmentation
In recent years, researchers have shown that aerobic microorganisms have the adaptability to degrade hydrocarbon in the soil but are limited by accessible oxygen, which will act as an electron acceptor to sustain and keep the growing population. For these, researchers developed a means to put this problem in check through bioaugmentation. Bioaugmentation, as the word implies, involves the addition of natural, cultured or genetically modified microorganisms with required metabolic adaptability into treatment which could be contaminated soil, water or sewage for degradation of targeted pollutants or pollutants. When bacteria are exposed to pollutant for a long period it evolved adaptive abilities such as increased in content of cyclopropane fatty acids, Saturation of membrane fatty acids, isomerization of cis unsaturated fatty acids to their appropriate trans isomers, Production of stress proteins, Changes in cell morphology and Toxic pollutants as substrates for the efflux system.[37] In hydrocarbon contaminated soil, selected hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms are inoculated into the soil to speed up the biodegrading capacity of the hydrocarbon in the soil. A single oil-degrading strains inoculate into hydrocarbon culture shows high degrading capacity as it was noticed by a researcher, an isolate G7 (Brevibacillus agri) had high ability to degrade aromatic fraction (61,14%), isolate G3 (Pseudoxhantomonas taewanensis) had high ability to degrade aromatic fraction (38,27%) and resin fraction (29,26%).[38] It was also reported by a researcher that P. aeruginosa BAS-Cr1 was able to degrade oil sludge with more than 80% degradation of TPH at 5% and 10% concentration within 42 days of treatment. [39] Findings by another researcher show an increase in the degradation rate of 4-chloronitoben-zene (4CNB) degradation in soil microcosm by inoculation of pure cultured Pseudomonas putida ZWL73.[40] However, studies have shown that the use of consortia with different kinds of aromatic-degrading bacteria has been more efficient in degrading pollutants as compared with using selected single strain.[41], [42] Assessing the degrading mineralize anthracene, phenanthrene and pyrene abilities of a selected microbial consortium of Mycobacterium fortuitum, Bacillus cereus, Microbacterium sp., Gordonia polyisoprenivorans, Microbacteriaceae bacterium, and Fusarium oxysporum. Within 70 days, an average degradation of 96% to 99% was recorded in mineralize anthracene, phenanthrene, and pyrene present in the soil, with an initial dose of (250, 500 and 1000 mg kg1). It was also observed that the PAH in the soil was degraded by 70% by the same consortium within the same incubation period of 70 days.[43] Researches have shown that when a consortium is immobilized, its soil hydrocarbon degradation ability increases. A researcher[44] compared the differences between biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatments on crude oil- contaminated soil; the researcher reported that treatment with bacteria immobilized peanut hull powder has the most effective treatment of hydrocarbon biodegradation in soil. According to,[45] immobilization of microbial cells system for bioremediation possess many advantages with few includes; resist to toxic chemical attack, solvent, heavy metals, temperature, and pH, providing suitable microbial environmental conditions, protection against shear damage, high flow rates of and volumetric productivities, elimination of cell washout problems at high dilution rates, providing cell high biomass. Biocarriers enhanced diffusion of oxygen in the soil, nutrient mass transfer to the bacteria and improved water-retention capacity that served as a limiting factor for bioremediation such contaminants as crude oil.[43], [4]
Countries | Microbial system used | Nutrients used |
USA | Pure or mixed cultures of Bacillus, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, and Gram-negative rods; mixed cultures of hydrocarbon degrading bacteria; mixed cultures of marine source bacteria; spore suspension of Clostridium; indigenous stratal microflora; slime- forming bacteria; ultramicrobacteria | Molasses 2–4%, Molasses and ammonium nitrate addition, addition of Free corn syrup and mineral salts, Maltodextrine and organic phosphate esters (OPE), Salt solution, Sucrose 10% +Peptone 1% + NaCl 0.5–30%, Brine supplemented with nitrogen and phosphorous sources and nitrate, Biodegradable paraffinic fractions + mineral salts, Naturally contain inorganic and organic materials + N, P sources. |
Russia | Pure cultures of C. tyrobutiricum; bacteria mixed cultures; indigenous microflora of water injection and water formation; activated sludge bacteria; naturally occurring microbiota of industrial (food) wastes. | Molasses 2–6% with nitrogen and phosphorous salt addition ; Water injection with nitrogen and phosphorous salt and air addition ; Waste waters with addition of biostimulators and chemical additives ; Industrial wastes with salts addition Dry milk 0.04%. |
China | Mixed enriched bacterial cultures of Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Eurobacterium, Fusobacterium, Bacteroides; Slime-forming bacteria: Xanthomonas campestris, Brevibacterium viscogenes, Corynebacterium gumiform; Microbial products as biopolymers. | Molasses 4–6%; Molasses 5% + ; Residue sugar 4% +; Crude oil 5% ; Xanthan 3% in waterflooding. |
Australia | Ultra microbacteria with surface active Properties. | Formulate suitable base media. |
Bulgaria | Indigenous oil-oxidizing bacteria from water injection and water formation | Water containing air C ammonium and phosphate ions ; Molasses 2% |
Canada | Pure culture of Leuconostoc mesenteroides. | Dry sucrose C sugar beet molasses dissolved in water. |
Former Czechoslovakia | Hydrocarbon oxidizing bacteria(predominant Pseudomonas sp.);sulfate-reducing bacteria | Molasse. |
England | Naturally occurring anaerobic strain, high generator of acids; special starved bacteria, good producers of exopolymers. | Soluble carbohydrate sources ; Suitable growth media (type E and G. |
Former East Germany | Mixed cultures of thermophilic Bacillus and Clostridium from indigenous brine microflora | Molasses 2–4% with addition of nitrogen and phosphorous source. |
Hungary | Mixed sewage-sludge bacteria cultures (predominant: Clostridium, Desulfovibrio, and Pseudomonas). | Molasses 2–4% with addition of sugar and nitrogen and phosphorous source. |
Norway | Nitrate-reducing bacteria naturally occurring in North Sea water. | Nitrate and 1% carbohydrates addition to injected Sea water. |
Poland | Mixed bacteria cultures (Arthrobacter, Clostridium, Mycobacterium, Peptococcus, and Pseudomonas). | Molasses. |
Romania | Adapted mixed enrichment cultures (predominant: Bacillus, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, and other Gram-negativerods). | Molasses 2–4%. |
Saudi Arabia | Adequate bacterial inoculum according to requirements of each technology. | Adequate nutrients for each technology. |
The Netherlands | Slime-forming bacteria (Betacoccus dextranicus). | Sucrose-molasses 10%. |
Trinidad-Tobago | Facultative anaerobic bacteria high producers of gases. | Molasses 2-4%. |
Venezuela | Adapted mixed enrichment cultures. | Molasses. |
Biostimulation for Hydrocarbons Degradation
Biostimulation is a method of remediation of a polluted environment through the addition of stimulants like nutrients, oxygen, and water to the environment of the contaminated site which could be soil, water or sludge, to initiate rapid multiplication and growth of the microbial biome for rapid bioremediation. The stimulation of microorganism’s activities by the addition of substrates, oxygen vitamins, and other microorganisms tolerated compounds to enhance the degradation of pollutants such as petroleum hydrocarbon is termed biostimulation.[2] it also involves the enhancement of cometabolism.[47] The depletion of
Nitrogen and phosphorus in petroleum-contaminated soil can be responsible for the low degradation of hydrocarbon in contaminated sites.[48] The importance of nutrients for biodegradation of a contaminated site was noticed in the positive correlations of nitrogen and phosphorus with hydrocarbon.[49] Abundant nitrogen and phosphorus in crude oil contaminated site goes a long way in stabilizing the even distribution of microbial community and the richness if the site which is an essential factors for biodegradation of hydrocarbon.[50]
Biostimulation contents | Bioremediated Contaminant | TPH % degradation | Bioremed iation Duration | Conclusions | References |
Cow dungs and Sewage slug | Used engine oil | 94% and 82% | 98 days | Cow dung and sewage sludge can be an effective organic amendment for the biodegradation of used lubricant contaminated soil | 5 |
Tea leaf, soy cake and potato skin | Petroleum Hydrocarbon diesel fuel | 40-89% | 126 days | The study therefore proves the viability of using soy cake amendment in remediating hydrocarbon contaminated soil. | 3 |
Peanut hull powder (15% w/w, no immobilized cells) | Contaminated soil samples from an oil storage site | 38% | 12 weeks | Oil degradation was enhanced using peanut hull powder as biocarrier. As it enhanced the transferred of biomass, water, oxygen, nutrients and hydrocarbons | 44 |
Brewery, Spent grains, Banana skin and Spent mushroom compost | Petroleum Hydrocarbons used engine oil | 79% and 92% for 5% oil contamination 36% to 55% for 15% oil contamination | 84 days | There was significant removal Of TPH using the organic nutrient sources. | 53 |
Non-Sterile poultry wastes | Polluted Mangrove Swamp Soil | 70% | 42 days | Non-sterile poultry waste can effectively and efficiently enhance removal of petroleum from polluted site. | 52 |
Domestic wastewater sludge | Crude oil- contaminated soil | 98.3% | 30 days | The addition of nutrient and inoculum would be the best option for hydrocarbon biodegradation. | 54 |
Sugar cane bagasse, empty fruit bunch of Oil palm tree | Petroleum hydrocarbon crude oil | 100%, 97% | 20 days | There was significant increase in the rate of biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon using the above supplements which stimulate bacteria growth and metabolism. | 51 |
The effect of Biosurfactant on Hydrocarbon Biodegradation
Biosurfactants is amphipathic configured polymers with prominent hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties which enable them to mold micelles that gathered at the interface between liquids of different polarities such as water and wax, they are polymers that are partial or total extracellular secreted by bacteria.[55], [56] It modified the surface properties of bacteria cells; increase the bioavailability hydrocarbon and the surface area of hydrophobic water-water insoluble substances like petroleum crude oil. Biosurfactant can function at extreme pH and salinity, as well as variable temperature conditions, less toxic, biodegradable and non-hazardous.[57], [58]
Biosurfactants which are generally derived from the secondary metabolites of microorganisms,[59] are important biomolecules in environmental biotechnology because of its application in oil industries especially oil spill sites bioremediation, recovery of oil, cleaning of oil storage tank from sludge and environmentally friendly characteristics.[60] The physical and chemical properties of microbial biosurfactants such as biodegradability, foaming, and environmental compatibility give them the edge over their equivalent.[60]
Biosurfactant is an effective biostimulant in crude oil hydrocarbon degradation. This was found out in a study of effect of biosurfactant and fertilizer on biodegradation of crude oil by marine isolates of Bacillus megaterium, Corynebacterium kutscheri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa by researchers, according to the research findings, Biosurfactants alone are capable of promoting biodegradation process, if the polluted site have the required nutrients. However, little significant increase in the rate of biodegradation was observed when compared to the treatments where biosurfactant and fertilizer were combined.[61]
Biosurfactant secreting bacteria are very efficient in crude oil hydrocarbon degradation, investigating the effect of the Addition of Biosurfactant Produced by Pseudomonas sp. On Biodegradation of Crude Oil by researchers, they find out that growth of the bacterial isolate on crude oil has been associated with the production of biosurfactants, they conclude that the crude oil metabolizing bacterium is able to secrete surfactants which further enhance the hydrocarbon degradation.[62] Some examples of biosurfactants of commercial and detoxification importance are; rhamnolipid, a glycolipid type biosurfactant produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, lipopeptide biosurfactant commonly known as surfactin produced by Bacillus subtilis, arthrofactin from Pseudomonas species, iturin and lichenysin produced by Bacillus species, mannosylerythritol lipids (MEL) from Candida, emulsan from Acinetobacter species, alasan from Acinetobacter radioresistens, serrawettin from Serratia species, viscosin, amphisin, putisolvin, hydrophobin, lokisin and tensin etc.[63]
Genome Sequence Basis for Crude Oil Degradation
Perusal proteomic analyses of strains have been potential tools to examine the relationship between various pathways encoded in the genome.[64] This has revealed some potentially crude oil degradation endowed bacteria. These bacteria have a genome with some genes that saves as a genetic base for the production of secondary metabolites from which biosurfactants are derived. Crude oil degradation genes regulates glycolipid, thioesterases and peptide synthetases synthesis,[65], [66], [67] it is well known that lipopeptides are biosynthesized through the ribosome-independent pathway with non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) enzymes moderated by genes.[68] A genus Polymorphum SL003B-26A1T endowed with a gene that coded for some vital enzymes such as ketoreductase (RhlG), 3-oxoacyl-(acyl- carrier protein) reductase and acyltransferase, phosphomannomutase (AlgC) that contribute majorly to the synthesis of glycolipids, which equipped this strain for the degradation of both saturated and unsaturated aliphatic hydrocarbon, monocyclic and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, as well enhanced their perpetual adaptation in the crude oil polluted environment.[69] The expression and regulation of these enzymes are coordinated at the transcriptional level of at least two quorum sensing system.[70], [71] The genetic regulated biodurfactant synthentic pathways have not been fully studied, however, according to,[72] there are three major processes involved in biosurfactants biosynthesis which are; biosynthesis of 3-hydroxy-heneicosanoic acid from specific carbon sources through fatty acid, synthesis of hexapeptide by a series of enzymatic condensations from the N-terminal of Leu to the C-terminal of Gly; and the 3- hydroxy-heneicosanoic acid may undergo an enzymatic condensation process, being incorporated at the C- and N- terminals of the hexapeptide to produce a cyclic lipopeptide. Some of the genes that played vital roles in crude oil degradation are illustrated in table3 with their biosurfactants.
Microbes | Genes | Biosurfactant | References |
Bacillus subtilis | ituD, ituA, ituB, and ituC. | Iturin | 75,76 ? |
Bacillus licheniformis | licA, licB and licC | Lichenysin | 81,82 |
Pseudomonas sp. MIS38 | arfA, arfB, and arfC | arthrofactin | 74 |
Pseudomonas sp | rhlA, B, R and I. | rhamnolipid | 70 |
Pseudomonas fluorescens | ViscAR and ViscBCR | viscosin | 73 |
Pseudomonas syringae | GacA/GacS and amsY | Amphisin | 80 |
Pseudomonas putida | dnaK, dnaJ and grpE. psoA, psoB and psoC | Putisolvins | 79 |
Acinetobacter radioresistens Bacillus sp | AlnA, AlnB and AlnC SrfAA, SrfAB, SrfAC and SrfAD or SrfA-TE, sfp. | Alasan Surfactin | 77,78 ? |
Conclusion
This work illustrates some methods of crude oil polluted soil bioremediation, effects of PAH on both physical and chemical properties of the soil and some factors that can affect the rate of PAH biodegradation. Environmental PAH pollution has been a threat to man and his immediate surroundings; cleansing of petroleum hydrocarbon pollution has caused many countries the huge amount of capital and financial resources. Understanding the mechanism of some petroleum hydrocarbons degrading bacteria can be very useful when applied to petroleum hydrocarbons contaminated sites like soil, sewage, and water body. Some microorganisms feed on crude oil as a source of carbon and generate energy for their metabolic activities; this is possible because some microbes like some species of bacteria secrete enzymes that can degrade petroleum hydrocarbons. However, most of the tested degradation was carried out in a controlled environment, therefore the probability of recording failure might be high if the degradation is carried out in a non-control environment, because unfavourable climatic factors can alter biodegradation. Moreover, there have been none 100% recorded degradation in the experimental crude oil degradation test. Therefore, further studies need to be carried out on crude oil degradation to understand the degradation mechanisms of some bacteria. A critical study of the genetic characteristics of some already known crude oil degrading bacteria will help researchers to discover new strains with higher degradation capability. More research still needs to be carried out to determine other mechanisms that bacteria make use of to degrade crude oil in their environment.
Source of Funding
None.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- I. Lazar, I. G. Petrisor, T. F. Yen. Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery (MEOR). Petroleum Sci Technol 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Isama Oyem, Oyem Lawrence Rank, Isama Lawrence. Effects of Crude Oil Spillage on Soil Physico- Chemical Properties inUgborodo Community. Int J Modern Engg Res 2013. [Google Scholar]
- P Agamuthu, A Dadrasnia. Potential biowastes to remediate diesel contaminated soils. Glob NEST J 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ewetola E. Abosede. Effect of Crude Oil Pollution on some Soil Physical Properties. IOSR J Agriculture Vet Sci 2013. [Google Scholar]
- P. Agamuthu, Y.S. Tan, S.H. Fauziah. Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil Using Selected Organic Wastes. Procedia Environ Sci 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Guangwei Guangwei He. The Soil pollution crisis in China: a cleanup presents daunting challenge. 2014. [Google Scholar]
- . S Jayanta, Kumar Saha. Soil Pollution - An Emerging Threat to Agriculture. Status of Soil Pollution in Indian 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mariana Marinescu, M Toti, Veronica Tanase, Vera Carabulea, Plopeanu Georgiana, Irina Calciu. An assessment of the effects of crude oil pollution on soil properties. Ann Food Sci Technol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Luchun Duan, Ravi Naidu, Palanisami Thavamani, Jean Meaklim, Mallavarapu Megharaj. Managing long-term polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contaminated soils: a risk-based approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Thamaraiselvan Rengarajan, Peramaiyan Rajendran, Natarajan Nandakumar, Boopathy Lokeshkumar, Palaniswami Rajendran, Ikuo Nishigaki. Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons with special focus on cancer. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Uchechukwu V Okere. Biodegradation of PAHs in ‘Pristine’ soils from different climatic regions. J Bioremed Biodegrad 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- L U Obi, H I Atagana, R A Adeleke. Isolation and characterization of crude oil sludge degrading bacteria. Springer Plus 1946. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Zulfa Aldisi, Samir Jaoua, Dhabia Al-Thani. Isolation, Screening and Activity of Hydrocarbon- Degrading Bacteria from Harsh Soils. Isolation, Screening and Activity of Hydrocarbon- Degrading Bacteria from Harsh Soils. 2016. Proceedings of the World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’16) . 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Dariush Minai-Tehrani, Saeed Minoui, Ali Herfatmanesh. Effect of Salinity on Biodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) of Heavy Crude Oil in Soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- S. Gan, E.V. Lau, H.K. Ng. Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Hazardous Mater 2009. [Google Scholar]
- H.A. Moubasher, A.K. Hegazy, N.H. Mohamed, Y.M. Moustafa, H.F. Kabiel, A.A. Hamad. Phytoremediation of soils polluted with crude petroleum oil using Bassia scoparia and its associated rhizosphere microorganisms. Int Biodeterioration Biodegradation 2015. [Google Scholar]
- S Budavari. . The Merck index: an encyclopedia of chemicals, drugs and biological, 12th edn 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Saranya Kuppusamy, Palanisami Thavamani, Mallavarapu Megharaj, Ravi Naidu. Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by novel bacterial consortia tolerant to diverse physical settings – Assessments in liquid- and slurry-phase systems. Int Biodeterioration Biodegradation 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Tekleweini Gereslassie, Ababo Workineh, Xiaoning Liu, Xue Yan, Jun Wang. Occurrence and Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Soils from Wuhan, Central China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018. [Google Scholar]
- E Moses, E I Uwah. The effect of crude oil pollution on some soil fertilities paramenters in Ikot Oboreyin, Ikot Abasi Akwa Ibom State Nigeria. Merit Res J Environ Environ Sci Toxicol 2015. [Google Scholar]
- M. O. Benka-Coker, J. A. Ekundayo. Effects of an oil spill on soil physico-chemical properties of a spill site in the Niger Delta Area of Nigeria. Environ Monitoring Assess 1995. [Google Scholar]
- . US Microbics. Annual Report FY-2003. . [Google Scholar]
- Ta-Chen Lin, Po-Tsen Pan, Sheng-Shung Cheng. Ex situ bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil. J Hazardous Mater 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Mikołaj Owsianiak, Arnaud Dechesne, Philip J. Binning, Julie C. Chambon, Sebastian R. Sørensen, Barth F. Smets. Evaluation of Bioaugmentation with Entrapped Degrading Cells as a Soil Remediation Technology. Environ Sci Technol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Guang-Guoying. . Integrated Analytical Approaches for Pesticide Management 2018. [Google Scholar]
- D Johnson. Pollutants | Persistent Organic (POPs). Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfgang Fritsche, Martin Hofrichter. . Aerobic Degradation by Microorganisms 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Arijit Samajdar. Bioremediation using Fungi – Mycoremediation. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Daniel Delille, Frederic Coulon, Emilien Pelletier. Effects of temperature warming during a bioremediation study of natural and nutrient-amended hydrocarbon-contaminated sub-Antarctic soils. Cold Regions Sci Technol 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Javed Iqbal, Caroline Metosh-Dickey, Ralph J. Portier. Temperature effects on bioremediation of PAHs and PCP contaminated south Louisiana soils: A laboratory mesocosm study. J Soils Sediments 2007. [Google Scholar]
- L. Ruberto, R. Dias, A. Lo Balbo, S.C. Vazquez, E.A. Hernandez, W.P. Mac Cormack. Influence of nutrients addition and bioaugmentation on the hydrocarbon biodegradation of a chronically contaminated Antarctic soil. J Appl Microbiol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Roshanak Rezaei Kalantary, Anoushiravan Mohseni-Bandpi, Ali Esrafili, Simin Nasseri, Fatemeh Rashid Ashmagh, Sahand Jorfi. Effectiveness of biostimulation through nutrient content on the bioremediation of phenanthrene contaminated soil. J Environ Health Sci Engg 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Raina M Maier. . Bioavailability and Its Importance to Bioremediation 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Fatemeh Bahmani, Seyed Ahmad Ataei, Mohammad Ali Mikaili. The Effect of Moisture Content Variation on the Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soils: Modeling and Experimental Investigation. J Environ Anal Chem 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Joshua D. Shrout, Gene F. Parkin. Influence of electron donor, oxygen, and redox potential on bacterial perchlorate degradation. Water Res 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Rakesh M Pawar. The Effect of Soil pH on Bioremediation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHS). J Bioremed Biodegr 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Amel Bouderhem, Aminata Ould El Hadj Khelil. Isolation and characterization of crude oil degrading bacteria from soil of Ouargla (Algeria). Int J Biosci 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Dercová Katarína, Murínová Slavomíra, Dudášová Hana. The Adaptation Mechanisms of Bacteria Applied in Bioremediation of Hydrophobic Toxic Environmental Pollutants: How Indigenous and Introduced Bacteria Can Respond to Persistent Organic Pollutants-Induced Stress. 2018. [Google Scholar]
- I A Purwasena, D I Astuti, R Fatmawati, Q Afinanisa. Isolation and Characterization of Oil- Degrading Bacteria from One of South Sumatera’s Oilfield. 2017. [Google Scholar]
- M T Piakong, Z Nur Zaida. Effectiveness of Single and Microbial Consortium of Locally Isolated Beneficial Microorganisms (LIBeM) in Bioaugmentation of Oil Sludge Contaminated Soil at Different Concentration Levels: A Laboratory Scale. J Bioremed Biodegr 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- G-L Niu, J-J Zhang, S Zhao, H Liu, N Boon, N-Y Zhou. Bioaugmentation of a 4-chloronitrobenzene contami-nated soil withPseudomonas putidaZWL73. Environ Pollut 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Eeva Heinaru, Merike Merimaa, Signe Viggor, Merit Lehiste, Ivo Leito, Jaak Truu. Biodegradation efficiency of functionally important populations selected for bioaugmentation in phenol- and oil-polluted area. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Farinazleen Mohamad Ghazali, Raja Noor Zaliha Abdul Rahman, Abu Bakar Salleh, Mahiran Basri. Biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil by microbial consortium. Int Biodeterioration Biodegradation 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigo J.S. Jacques, Benedict C. Okeke, Fatima M. Bento, Aline S. Teixeira, Maria C.R. Peralba, Flavio A.O. Camargo. Microbial consortium bioaugmentation of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated soil. Bioresource Technol 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Yaohui Xu, Mang Lu. Bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil: Comparison of different biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatments. J Hazardous Mater 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Zeynab Bayat, Mehdi Hassanshahian, Simone Cappello. Immobilization of Microbes for Bioremediation of Crude Oil Polluted Environments: A Mini Review. Open Microbiol J 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- De Lorenzo, V. Systems biology approaches to bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol . [Google Scholar]
- Ramdas Gopinath Kanissery, Gerald K. Sims. Biostimulation for the Enhanced Degradation of Herbicides in Soil. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- . International Centre for Soil and Contaminated Sites. Manual for biological remediation techniques. 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Manli Wu, Jialuo Wu, Xiaohui Zhang, Xiqiong Ye. Effect of bioaugmentation and biostimulation on hydrocarbon degradation and microbial community composition in petroleum-contaminated loessal soil. Chemosphere 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ainon Hamzah, Chia-Wei Phan, Pek-Hoon Yong, Nurul Hayati Mohd Ridzuan. Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch and Sugarcane Bagasse Enhance the Bioremediation of Soil Artificially Polluted by Crude Oil. Soil Sediment Contamination: Int J 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Charles Chibueze Ezekoye, Ebiokpo Rebecca Amakoromo. Abiye Anthony Ibiene. Laboratory - Based Bioremediation of Hydrocarbon Polluted Mangrove Swamp Soil in the Niger Delta Using Poultry Wastes. Microbiol Res J Int 2017. [Google Scholar]
- O. P. Abioye, P. Agamuthu, A. R. Abdul Aziz. Biodegradation of Used Motor Oil in Soil Using Organic Waste Amendments. Biotechnol Res Int 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Ma’an Fahmi Alkhatib. An isolated bacterial consortium for crude oil biodegradation. Afr J Biotechnol 2011. [Google Scholar]
- N G K Karanth, P Deo, N Veenanadig. Microbial production of biosurfactants and their importance. Curr Sci 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Danyelle Santos, Raquel Rufino, Juliana Luna, Valdemir Santos, Leonie Sarubbo. Biosurfactants: Multifunctional Biomolecules of the 21st Century. Int J Mol Sci 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Yong Nie, Yue-Qin Tang, Yan Li, Chang-Qiao Chi, Man Cai, Xiao-Lei Wu. The Genome Sequence of Polymorphum gilvum SL003B-26A1T Reveals Its Genetic Basis for Crude Oil Degradation and Adaptation to the Saline Soil. PLoS ONE 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Raina M Maier. Biosurfactants: Evolution and Diversity in Bacteria. Adv Appl Microbiol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Magdalena Pacwa-Płociniczak, Grażyna A. Płaza, Zofia Piotrowska-Seget, Swaranjit Singh Cameotra. Environmental Applications of Biosurfactants: Recent Advances. Int J Mol Sci 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Marek Adamczak, Włodzimierz Bednarski. Influence of medium composition and aeration on the synthesis of biosurfactants produced by Candida Antarctica. Biotechnol Lett 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Rengathavasi Thavasi, Singaram Jayalakshmi, Ibrahim M. Banat. Effect of biosurfactant and fertilizer on biodegradation of crude oil by marine isolates of Bacillus megaterium, Corynebacterium kutscheri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bioresource Technol 2011. [Google Scholar]
- A Aparna, G Srinikethan, Smitha Hegde. Effect of Addition of Biosurfactant Produced by Pseudomonas sps. 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Palashpriya Das, Soumen Mukherjee, Ramkrishna Sen. Genetic Regulations of the Biosynthesis of Microbial Surfactants: An Overview. Biotechnol Genet Engg Rev 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Yue-Hui Hong, Cong-Cong Ye, Qian-Zhi Zhou, Xiao-Ying Wu, Jian-Ping Yuan, Juan Peng. Genome Sequencing Reveals the Potential of Achromobacter sp. HZ01 for Bioremediation. Front Microbiol 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- Surekha K. Satpute, Arun G. Banpurkar, Prashant K. Dhakephalkar, Ibrahim M. Banat, Balu A. Chopade. Methods for investigating biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Shiyi Yao, Xuewen Gao, Norbert Fuchsbauer, Wolfgang Hillen, Joachim Vater, Jinsheng Wang. Cloning, Sequencing, and Characterization of the Genetic Region Relevant to Biosynthesis of the Lipopeptides Iturin A and Surfactin in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Microbiol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Anne-Laure Moyne, Thomas E. Cleveland, Sadik Tuzun. Molecular characterization and analysis of the operon encoding the antifungal lipopeptide bacillomycin D. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Niran Roongsawang, Kenji Washio, Masaaki Morikawa. Diversity of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases Involved in the Biosynthesis of Lipopeptide Biosurfactants. Int J Mol Sci 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Y Nie, Y.-Q Tang, Y Li. The Genome Sequence of Polymorphum gilvum SL003B-26A1T Reveals Its Genetic Basis for Crude Oil Degradation and Adaptation to the Saline Soil. PLoS ONE 2012. [Google Scholar]
- S Waack, O Keller, R Asper, T Brodag, C Damm. Score-based prediction of genomic islands in prokaryotic genomes using hidden Markov models. BMC Bioinformatics 2006. [Google Scholar]
- R. M. Maier, G. Soberón-Chávez. Pseudomonas aeruginosa rhamnolipids: biosynthesis and potential applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Yue-Hui Hong, Cong-Cong Ye, Qian-Zhi Zhou, Xiao-Ying Wu, Jian-Ping Yuan, Juan Peng. Genome Sequencing Reveals the Potential of Achromobacter sp. HZ01 for Bioremediation. Front Microbiol 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
- I. de Bruijn, J. M. Raaijmakers. Diversity and Functional Analysis of LuxR-Type Transcriptional Regulators of Cyclic Lipopeptide Biosynthesis in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Niran Roongsawang, Ken-ichi Hase, Mitsuru Haruki, Tadayuki Imanaka, Masaaki Morikawa, Shigenori Kanaya. Cloning and Characterization of the Gene Cluster Encoding Arthrofactin Synthetase from Pseudomonas sp. MIS38. Chem Biol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Kenji Tsuge, Takanori Akiyama, Makoto Shoda. Cloning, Sequencing, and Characterization of the Iturin A Operon. J Bacteriol 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammad Shahedur Rahman, Takashi Ano, Makoto Shoda. Second stage production of iturin A by induced germination of Bacillus subtilis RB14. J Biotechnol 2006. [Google Scholar]
- M.M.M. Ahmed, Elsayed E. Hafez, M.A. El Saadani. Biodegradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by recombinant bacteria containing Alasan gene. Int J Environ Pollut 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Y Zhi, Q Wu, Y Xu. Genome and transcriptome analysis of surfactin biosynthesis in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MT45. Sci Rep 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Jean-Frédéric Dubern, Eric R. Coppoolse, Willem J. Stiekema, Guido V. Bloemberg. Genetic and functional characterization of the gene cluster directing the biosynthesis of putisolvin I and II in Pseudomonas putida strain PCL1445. Microbiol 2008. [Google Scholar]
- J. B. Andersen. Surface motility in Pseudomonas sp. DSS73 is required for efficient biological containment of the root-pathogenic microfungi Rhizoctonia solani and Pythium ultimum. Microbiol 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Dirk Konz, Sascha Doekel, Mohamed A. Marahiel. Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of the Protein Template Controlling Biosynthesis of the Lipopeptide Lichenysin. J Bacteriol 1999. [Google Scholar]
- S N Anuradha. Structural and Molecular Characteristics of Lichenysin and Its Relationship with Surface Activity. Biosurfactants 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Introduction
- Hydrocarbon Contaminated Soil
- Soil bioremediation and its Mechanism
- Influencer factors of biodegradation of Petroleum hydrocarbon
- Temperature
- Nutrients
- Bioavailability of Contaminant:
- Moisture content
- Electron donor, Oxygen content and Redox Potential:
- PH
- Bioaugmentation
- The effect of Biosurfactant on Hydrocarbon Biodegradation
- Genome Sequence Basis for Crude Oil Degradation
- Conclusion
- Source of Funding
- Conflict of Interest