Get Permission Parivallal, Govindaraju, Nagalingam, and Devarajan: Performance evaluation of 1 MLD MBBR type sewage treatment plant


Introduction

Screening (Bar screen and grit chamber)

The raw sewage first be screened through a manual bar screen, where all particles with diameter below 5 mm as well as small pieces of the fibre and floating suspended matters like polythene paper, polythene bags, rags and others materials are removed. These units are used to protect downstream equipment such as pumps, pipelines, valves etc. from damage and clogging by rags and other large objects. The bar screen and grit chamber is cleaned manually by means of rakes. The screened clean effluent flows by gravity to an equalization tank.1, 2

Oil & grease chamber

The screened wastewater then gets skimmed properly to remove Oil and Grease. The removal principle based on density and viscosity of the sewage.

Equalization tank

The raw wastewater collected in the equalization tank, where it is equalized with respect to its characteristics, homogeneity, flow and uniform pollution load as well as to make bacteria acclimatized. The equalization tank is designed for hydraulic retention time of around 6 hours. Proper equalization process minimizes the shock loadings and stabilizes the pH to improve the biological oxidation reaction in the next downstream units.

Anoxic tank

Anoxic zones in wastewater are useful for nitrogen removal. Wastewater has a high nitrate and nitrite content, and the treatment process must break down those compounds to avoid causing nutrient pollution when the plant discharges its effluent back into the environment. In anoxic zones bacteria break down the nitrogen products and release nitrogen gas into the atmosphere.

MBBR tank (Secondary-treatment) 3, 4, 5

The process of Oxidation, synthesis and endogenous respiration happens in the MBBR tank or aeration tank. Eco-friendly available in the sewage facilitates the above process; hence the complex organic compound gets converted to simpler organic substance. Bacteria or bio augmenter staying in MBBR Media surface and does the job utilizing the supplied oxygen through Air blowers.

Figure 1

MBBR media

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a6cf88f7-7776-4c43-a6ea-3825eec9293d/image/e327168e-df2f-4655-ad94-297e36ae3f9e-uimage.png

Figure 2

Bacterial attachment

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a6cf88f7-7776-4c43-a6ea-3825eec9293d/image/07cb6dfc-6cd6-4ed7-9ad2-85a9e5e8dbf7-uimage.png

Figure 3

STP 1 MLD front view

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a6cf88f7-7776-4c43-a6ea-3825eec9293d/image/2ea409a8-eb7f-49b5-949f-ccdb86a4dce8-uimage.png

Figure 4

MBBR aeration zone

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a6cf88f7-7776-4c43-a6ea-3825eec9293d/image/7db63dbc-e1e7-4357-8ab9-8759d9283ae9-uimage.png

Figure 5

Biological process happens in aeration zone

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/a6cf88f7-7776-4c43-a6ea-3825eec9293d/image/b0fabca6-3d2e-4832-8afe-2dc62da9d857-uimage.png

Tube settler

The oxidized sewage will be dosed with coagulants and flocculants and allowed to pass through the Tube Settler. Here the suspended solid gets settled inside the tube settler through the intact arrangements of tube settler media. A substantial amount BOD and COD are also removed in the coagulation and flocculation process.

Disinfection System

Chlorine disinfection system installed to oxidize the pathogenic bacteria from the treated sewage water and then allowed to pass through the filtration units like PSF and ACF.

Pressure Sand Filter (PSF)

From the filter feed tank, the clear water is pumped to the pressure sand filter. The filtration takes place in the downward mode. The filter is filled with a layer of graded sand media supported by a layer of graded gravel. The suspended matters from the effluent get filtered.

Activated carbon filter (ACF)

In this unit the feed flow is downward through a layer of granular activated carbon filter in which dissolved organics of the effluent are absorbed. It is necessary to backwash the carbon filter every eight hours.

Sludge Treatment and handling

The sludge generated in the Sludge Holding Tank is taken to a sludge sump. The waste is then pumped to a Sludge Drying Bed. The dried cake may be disposed of to deliver in the brickfield for burning. The further waste sludge will be flow back to equalization tank for further treatment.

Sewage treatment plant existing

Project Name: Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Kadapa A.P

Project Type: Sewage Treatment Plant.

Design Capacity: 1 MLD.

Operation Hours: 24 hrs.

Technology: Moving Bed Bioreactor (MBBR).

System Erected by: M/S. Green Enviro Polestar, Pondicherry.

Table 1

Scheme and unit volume of 1 MLD sewage treatment plant

S.No

Scheme of Sewage Treatment Plant

Unit Volume (m3)

1.

Bar screen Chamber

0.528

2.

Grit Chamber

2.70

3.

Oil & Grease Chamber

10.58

4.

Equalization Tank

304

5.

Anoxic Tank

107

6.

MBBR Tank

465

7.

Settling Tank (Tube Settler)

109

8.

Filter Feed Tank

85

9.

Treated Water Tank

252

10.

Chlorine Dosing System

0.1

Table 2

Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) removal efficiency

Date

BOD

Raw Sewage (mg/l)

Treated Sewage (mg/l)

Removal Efficiency (%)

02.10.2021

380

33

91.31

09.10.2021

324

12

96.29

16.10.2021

385

19

95.06

23.10.2021

382

15

96.07

30.10.2021

363

18

95.04

06.11.2021

396

21

94.69

13.11.2021

342

12

96.49

20.11.2021

280

7

97.50

Table 3

Chemical oxygen demand (COD) removal efficiency

Date

COD

Raw Sewage (mg/l)

Treated Sewage (mg/l)

Removal Efficiency (%)

02.10.2021

655

65

90.07

09.10.2021

752

145

80.71

16.10.2021

774

99

87.20

23.10.2021

688

54

92.15

30.10.2021

520

88

83.07

06.11.2021

680

55

91.91

13.11.2021

765

44

94.24

20.11.2021

702

48

93.16

Table 4

Total suspended solids (TSS)removal efficiency

Date

TSS

Raw Sewage (mg/l)

Treated Sewage (mg/l)

Removal Efficiency (%)

02.10.2021

180

67

62.77

09.10.2021

212

53

75.00

16.10.2021

218

69

68.34

23.10.2021

165

62

62.42

30.10.2021

189

54

71.42

06.11.2021

222

77

65.31

13.11.2021

240

74

69.16

20.11.2021

227

57

74.88

Table 5

Total kjeldal’s nitrogen (TKN) removal efficiency

Date

TKN

Raw Sewage

(mg/l)

Treated Sewage

(mg/l)

Removal Efficiency (%)

02.10.2021

78

33

57.70

09.10.2021

65

16

75.39

16.10.2021

54

17

68.52

23.10.2021

74

14

81.09

30.10.2021

64

8

87.50

06.11.2021

66

12

81.82

13.11.2021

48

8

83.34

20.11.2021

53

6

88.68

Results and Discussion

All the sorted water parameters were been tested by following the standard method (APHA, 1998).6, 7 The average BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand), COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), TSS (Total Suspended Solids) and TKN (Total Kjeldal’s Nitrogen) removal efficiency from the existing 1 MLD Sewage treatment plant were observed to be 95%, 89%, 68.5% and 78% respectively. Hence, we could able to see very good removal efficiency of BOD, COD and TKN. A very good reduction of BOD, COD and TKN value shows that there would be a healthy bacterial growth in the MBBR Unit and proper nitrogen removal happens in the Anoxic tank. Also, a better F/M (Food to the ratio of Microorganisms) observed to be maintained in the MBBR Tank. But the TSS reduction value found to be unacceptable; hence the PSF (Pressure Sand Filter) and ACF (Activated Carbon Filter) filters need to be operated properly as per the operation manual. Both the filters needs to be backwashed at regular basis and the delta P value (Pressure difference which can be monitored through the pressure gauges) should be maintained below 0.5 Kg/Cm2. Hence, this study can be helpful for the maintenance engineers in doing proper operation of the sewage treatment plant of the RIMS Hospital.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

Process Design Manual for Upgrading Existing Wastewater Treatment Plants for Environmental Protection Agency, Technology Transfer1974https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/9100WEPH.PDF?Dockey=9100WEPH.PDF

2 

R Storhaug Performance Stability of Small Biological Chemical Treatment PlantsWater Sci Technol1990223-427582

3 

JL Dakers AG Cockburn Rising the standard of operation of small sewage worksWater Sci Technol1990223-42616

4 

SN Kaul PK Mukherjee T Sirowala H Kulkarni T Nandy Performance evaluation of full scale waste water treatment facility for finished leather industryJ Environ Sci Health1993286127786

5 

CA Sastry MA Hashim P Agamuthu Waste Treatment PlantsNarosa Publishing HouseNew Delhi1995

6 

Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater20th edAmerican Public Health AssociationWashington, DC, New York, USA1998

7 

A Kapur A Kansal RK Prasad S Gupta Performance evaluation of Sewage Treatment Plant and Sludge bio-methanationIndian J Environ Prot19991996100



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 30-04-2022

Accepted : 25-05-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Copyright permission

Get article permission for commercial use

Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmr.2022.027


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 1752

PDF Downloaded: 965